Skip to content

FOLLOW AN IDEA

Proof by contradiction

Assume a claim fails and derive a contradiction with established assumptions.

Explore concept graph · Explore connected videos

Different ways to understand it

  • Examples of Proof by Contradiction

    John O'Brien · English · Explanation
    Connection evidence

    Reviewed English material v1: card "Proof by Contradiction Method" at 4:00 — A logical method where you assume the opposite of what you want to prove. If this assumption leads to a mathematical contradiction, the original assumption is false, proving your initial statement true.

  • Lecture 15.9 - Path-Connectedness

    Real Analysis Summer 2020 - Max Wimberley · English · Proof
    Connection evidence

    Reviewed English material v1: card "Proof by Contradiction: Path-connected to Connected" at 5:25 — The proof assumes the set EE is disconnected by open sets U1U_1 and U2U_2. It finds points ss and tt in different sets, uses path-connectedness to create a path γ\gamma between them, and then shows this path's image must be both connected (by a previous theorem) and disconnected (by U1U_1 and U2U_2), yielding a contradiction.

  • Uniform Convergence Made Easy!

    Math For Life · English · Proof
    Connection evidence

    Reviewed English material v1: card "Proving Non-Uniform Convergence by Contradiction" at 4:28 — To prove that fn(x)=xnf_n(x) = x^n does not converge uniformly on [0,1][0, 1], we assume the opposite: that it does converge uniformly. Since each fn(x)f_n(x) is continuous, the theorem implies the limit function f(x)f(x) must be continuous. However, we know the pointwise limit f(x)f(x) is discontinuous at x=1x=1. This contradiction means the assumption of uniform convergence is false.

  • Topology: Connectedness

    Center of Math · English · Application
    Connection evidence

    Reviewed English material v2: card "Contradiction setup for the union theorem" at 3:05 — The proof assumes X∪YX \cup Y is disconnected and introduces open sets UU and VV that separate it. The board writes U∪V=X∪YU \cup V = X \cup Y as the starting point for the contradiction.

Questions and answers about Proof by contradiction

Why does constructing x+1x+1 create a contradiction in the first proof?

Constructing x+1x+1 creates a contradiction because the proof initially assumes that xx is the last natural number. However, by adding 1 to xx, we get x+1x+1, which is still a natural number and is strictly larger than xx. This directly contradicts the assumption that xx was the final or largest natural number, proving that the set of natural numbers cannot be finite.

  • The proof assumes there is a finite amount of N\mathbb{N}.
  • xx is defined as the last natural number under this assumption.
  • The arithmetic property used is that if x∈Nx \in \mathbb{N}, then x+1∈Nx+1 \in \mathbb{N} and x+1>xx+1 > x.

Example: The speaker explains that if you take a natural number and add one, you get a bigger natural number. The written lines show "x+1∈Nx+1 \in \mathbb{N}" and "x+1>xx+1 > x", which contradict the earlier statement "let x be the last N\mathbb{N}."

Read the steps and sources →

How does the video prove that there are infinitely many natural numbers?

The video proves that there are infinitely many natural numbers by using a proof by contradiction. It assumes the opposite—that there is a finite amount of natural numbers—and then shows that this assumption leads to a logical contradiction. By constructing a larger natural number from the supposed last one, the proof demonstrates that the set of natural numbers cannot be finite.

  • The proof method is proof by contradiction (PBC).
  • The set under discussion is N\mathbb{N}, the natural numbers.
  • The arithmetic fact used is that adding 1 to a natural number yields a larger natural number.

Example: The handwritten proof shows: "Pbc.", "Assume that there is a finite amount of N\mathbb{N}.", "let x be the last N\mathbb{N}.", "x∈Nx \in \mathbb{N}", "x+1∈Nx+1 \in \mathbb{N}", "x+1>xx+1 > x", and finally "=> There is an infinite amount of N\mathbb{N}."

Read the steps and sources →

What exactly is assumed in the proof by contradiction for this theorem?

For the theorem that the product of two even numbers is even, the proof by contradiction assumes the opposite: that the product of two even numbers is odd. The speaker justifies this by stating that if a number is not even, it must be odd. This assumption sets up the logical framework to derive a contradiction.

  • The theorem to be proved is: the product of two even numbers is also even.
  • The method is proof by contradiction.
  • The parity dichotomy (not even implies odd) is used as an assumed fact.

Example: The presenter writes "Assume that the product of two even numbers is odd." The speaker says, "we'll again we'll use a proof by contradiction. So PBC. So we're going to assume the opposite." and "So if it's not even, it must be odd."

Read the steps and sources →

What does PBC mean in this video?

In this video, PBC stands for "proof by contradiction." It is a mathematical method used to prove a statement by assuming the opposite of the desired statement and deriving an inconsistency or contradiction. The video explicitly abbreviates "proof by contradiction" as "Pbc." on the page before starting the first example.

  • The context is a mathematical proof.
  • The method involves assuming the negation of the target statement.

Example: The speaker says, "So we're going to use a proof by contradiction, PBC." The abbreviation "Pbc." is written on the page before the assumption line.

Read the steps and sources →

More concepts to explore

  • Mathematical induction

    A base case and an inductive step establish a statement for all subsequent integers.

  • Proof by contraposition

    Proving not Q implies not P establishes the implication P implies Q.

  • Axiomatic systems

    An axiomatic theory derives theorems from stated axioms and inference rules.

  • Bijections

    A bijection is both injective and surjective and has a two-sided inverse.

  • Cartesian products

    A Cartesian product consists of ordered pairs with one component from each set.

Back to the complete concept index →

Knowledge connections

Appears in these maps

LEARNING MAP

Mathematical Foundations and Proofs

Explore sets and relations; logic and statements; proof and infinity. Concepts and connections are available independently of video coverage.

Scope reference