Skip to content
← All questions

How does the monotonicity of an increasing sequence ensure that all terms beyond index N satisfy an≥aNa_n \ge a_N?

By definition, a monotone increasing sequence satisfies an+1≥ana_{n+1} \ge a_n for all nn. Through induction or transitivity, if n>Nn > N, then an≥an−1≥⋯≥aNa_n \ge a_{n-1} \ge \dots \ge a_N. Thus, once a term aNa_N exceeds a threshold (like L−ϵL - \epsilon), all subsequent terms automatically exceed it as well.

Conditions

  • The sequence {an}\{a_n\} is monotone increasing.
  • NN is a fixed integer index.
  • nn is any integer such that n>Nn > N.

Reasoning, step by step

  1. Recall the definition of a monotone increasing sequence: ak≤ak+1a_k \le a_{k+1} for all kk.
  2. Identify the specific index NN where aN>L−ϵa_N > L - \epsilon.
  3. Apply the monotonicity property repeatedly for indices between NN and nn.
  4. Conclude that an≥aNa_n \ge a_N for any n>Nn > N.
  5. Combine this with the lower bound to show an>L−ϵa_n > L - \epsilon.

Example

If a5=0.9a_5 = 0.9 and the sequence is increasing, then a6≥0.9a_6 \ge 0.9, a7≥0.9a_7 \ge 0.9, etc. The script states: 'if aN>L−εa_N > L - ε, then every subsequent term ana_n (for n>Nn > N) must also satisfy an≥aN>L−εa_n \ge a_N > L - ε.'

Common misconceptions

  • Believing that later terms could dip below earlier terms in an increasing sequence.
  • Confusing monotone increasing (an+1≥ana_{n+1} \ge a_n) with strictly increasing (an+1>ana_{n+1} > a_n); the proof holds for both, but weak inequality is sufficient here.

Watch the explanation

Explore next

Answers are generated from source material and independently checked. Consult the original video or creator if something is unclear.