Skip to content
← All questions

What does it mean for F to be left adjoint to G in this lecture?

For functors F:A→BF:\mathcal{A}\to\mathcal{B} and G:B→AG:\mathcal{B}\to\mathcal{A}, FF is left adjoint to GG (written F⊣GF \dashv G) if there is a natural isomorphism between the hom-set B(F(A),B)\mathcal{B}(F(A),B) and the hom-set A(A,G(B))\mathcal{A}(A,G(B)) for all objects A∈AA \in \mathcal{A} and B∈BB \in \mathcal{B}. The video emphasizes that an adjunction is a chosen natural isomorphism, not just an abstract existence claim.

Conditions

  • FF is a functor A→B\mathcal{A} \to \mathcal{B}
  • GG is a functor B→A\mathcal{B} \to \mathcal{A}
  • AA is an object of A\mathcal{A}
  • BB is an object of B\mathcal{B}
  • The isomorphism is natural in both AA and BB

Reasoning, step by step

  1. Identify the two functors FF and GG pointing in opposite directions.
  2. Form the hom-set B(F(A),B)\mathcal{B}(F(A),B) in the category B\mathcal{B}.
  3. Form the hom-set A(A,G(B))\mathcal{A}(A,G(B)) in the category A\mathcal{A}.
  4. Establish a bijection between these two sets.
  5. Require that this bijection is natural in both variables AA and BB.

Example

The board writes: 'We say that F is left adjoint to G, and G is right adjoint to F, and write F ⊣ G if B(F(A),B)≅A(A,G(B))\mathcal{B}(F(A),B) \cong \mathcal{A}(A,G(B)) naturally in A∈AA \in \mathcal{A} and B∈BB \in \mathcal{B}.'

Common misconceptions

  • Thinking that the isomorphism is just a set-theoretic bijection without naturality.
  • Assuming that FF and GG themselves are naturally isomorphic, even though they go in opposite directions.

Watch the explanation

Connected concepts

Explore next

Related questions

Find a method

↗
Meet the concept

↗
Meet the concept

↗
Meet the concept

↗
Meet the concept

↗

Answers are generated from source material and independently checked. Consult the original video or creator if something is unclear.