Skip to content
← All questions

What everyday analogy is used for the triangle inequality?

The video uses the analogy of commuting from work to home. Going straight home represents the direct distance d(x,z)d(x,z). Stopping at a shop on the way represents going through an intermediate point yy, resulting in a total distance of d(x,y)+d(y,z)d(x,y) + d(y,z). The analogy illustrates that the detour is inevitably longer than or equal to the direct route.

Conditions

  • xx is work, zz is home, and yy is the shop.
  • The path is a journey in a metric space.

Reasoning, step by step

  1. Map the points: xx = work, zz = home, yy = shop.
  2. Compare the direct path (x→zx \to z) with the indirect path (x→y→zx \to y \to z).
  3. State that the indirect path involves extra travel.
  4. Conclude that d(x,z)≤d(x,y)+d(y,z)d(x,z) \leq d(x,y) + d(y,z) mirrors the real-world observation that detours don't shorten trips.

Example

The speaker says: 'if we make a detour on that journey, say if I need to go to the shop on my way home, we know we're inevitably going to be travelling further than if we were to just go straight.'

Common misconceptions

  • Thinking the analogy implies the shop must be on the straight line between work and home.
  • Confusing the analogy with a proof; it is an intuitive explanation.

Watch the explanation

Connected concepts

Explore next

Related questions

Find a method

↗
Understand why

↗
Meet the concept

↗
Understand why

↗

Answers are generated from source material and independently checked. Consult the original video or creator if something is unclear.