What three numeric evaluation vectors are shown before the conclusion in this clip?

Conditions

• The vectors are displayed as part of the example preceding the conclusion section.
• Each component is a decimal between 0 and 1.

Reasoning, step by step

1. Identify the vector for professional ethics: $(0.48, 0.38, 0.14)$.
2. Identify the vector for the amount of teaching exercise: $(0.65, 0.26, 0.09)$.
3. Identify the vector for the amount of teaching: $(0.57, 0.30, 0.13)$.

Example

The visible text states: professional ethics: (0.48, 0.38, 0.14); the amount of teaching exercise: (0.65, 0.26, 0.09); the amount of teaching: (0.57, 0.30, 0.13).

Common misconceptions

• Assuming these vectors are the final comprehensive evaluation result $B$ rather than individual indicator evaluations.
• Confusing the order of the components within the vectors.

Watch the explanation

Explore next

• How does the paper say the final label excellent is obtained from the displayed vectors?
• What role does the analytic hierarchy process play in the evaluation model described here?