Skip to content
← All questions

When can you ignore the smaller relative uncertainty in error propagation?

You can sometimes ignore the smaller relative uncertainty when one measurement is much more accurate, relatively speaking, than the other. In this case, the combined relative uncertainty is approximately equal to the larger one, and the more accurate measurement behaves as if it were an exact constant.

Conditions

  • The comparison is between relative uncertainties.
  • One measurement is much more accurate relative to the other.
  • The approximation is acceptable for the intended level of precision.

Reasoning, step by step

  1. Write the relative uncertainty quadrature formula: δzz=(δxx)2+(δyy)2\frac{\delta z}{z} = \sqrt{\left(\frac{\delta x}{x}\right)^2 + \left(\frac{\delta y}{y}\right)^2}.
  2. Compare the two relative uncertainties.
  3. Identify if one is much smaller than the other (e.g., 0.03% vs 5.4%).
  4. Drop the smaller squared term from the sum under the square root.
  5. Conclude that δzz≈δyy\frac{\delta z}{z} \approx \frac{\delta y}{y}, meaning the smaller uncertainty is negligible.

Example

The video shows an animation where a 0.03% relative uncertainty term shrinks and disappears, leaving only the 5.4% term. For a product z=xyz=xy, this approximation simplifies the absolute uncertainty to δz≈xδy\delta z \approx x\delta y, making xx behave like a constant.

Common misconceptions

  • Assuming it is always valid to treat the more accurate measurement as exact without checking the relative magnitudes.
  • Forgetting that this approximation applies to relative uncertainties, not absolute uncertainties, for products and quotients.
  • Believing that dropping a small term changes the fundamental quadrature rule for independent errors.

Watch the explanation

Explore next

Answers are generated from source material and independently checked. Consult the original video or creator if something is unclear.