Skip to content
← All questions

Why does the lecturer say the observed data are constant when discussing likelihood?

The lecturer states that once the data have been collected, they should be treated as constants because there is no more variability. This fixed-data perspective is what allows the likelihood to be discussed as a function of the parameter alone.

Conditions

  • The data have already been observed.
  • The discussion is in the inference stage rather than the sampling stage.

Reasoning, step by step

  1. Identify the sampling stage where X1,…,XnX_1, \dots, X_n are random variables.
  2. Recognize the transition to the inference stage after data collection.
  3. Understand that the realized values x1,…,xnx_1, \dots, x_n are now fixed constants.
  4. Shift the focus to finding a good value of the unknown parameter θ\theta given these fixed data.
  5. Define the likelihood function based on this fixed-data viewpoint.

Example

The speaker says, "now we've collected our data, we need to think of that data as constant. There's no more variability anymore. Now we're in math stat world where our data are collected and they're constant."

Common misconceptions

  • Confusing observed data with still-random quantities after they have been collected.
  • Thinking that randomness belongs to the likelihood evaluation stage rather than the sampling stage.

Watch the explanation

Connected concepts

Explore next

Related questions

Find a method

↗
Meet the concept

↗
Find a method

↗
Meet the concept

↗
Understand why

↗

Answers are generated from source material and independently checked. Consult the original video or creator if something is unclear.