Skip to content
← All questions

Why is a semidefinite Hessian inconclusive for classifying stationary points?

A semidefinite Hessian is inconclusive because the second-order term does not strictly determine the sign of the change in all directions. Higher-order terms or the function's behavior directly must be examined to determine if the point is a minimum, maximum, or saddle.

Conditions

  • The function is twice continuously differentiable.
  • The gradient is zero at the point.
  • The Hessian is semidefinite (positive or negative semi-definite).

Reasoning, step by step

  1. Recognize that a semidefinite Hessian has zero eigenvalues.
  2. Understand that the second-order change is zero in some directions.
  3. Realize that the sign of the function change in those directions depends on higher-order terms.
  4. Conclude that the second-order test alone cannot classify the point.

Example

If the Hessian is positive semidefinite, the second-order change is non-negative, but it is zero in some directions. The actual behavior in those flat directions requires looking at third or fourth-order derivatives.

Common misconceptions

  • Believing that a positive semidefinite Hessian guarantees a local minimum.
  • Assuming that a negative semidefinite Hessian guarantees a local maximum.
  • Thinking that the Hessian test is always sufficient for classification.

Watch the explanation

Connected concepts

Explore next

Answers are generated from source material and independently checked. Consult the original video or creator if something is unclear.