How can we speak of a natural isomorphism if F and G themselves go in opposite directions?
Conditions
- and
- Both sides are regarded as functors out of
- The natural isomorphism is between functors with the same domain and codomain
Reasoning, step by step
- Acknowledge that and go in opposite directions.
- Curry the hom-set expressions to form two new functors.
- Define the domain of these new functors as and the codomain as SET.
- State that adjointness is equivalent to these two new functors being naturally isomorphic.
Example
The board writes: 'i.e. F and G are adjoint iff , : are naturally isomorphic.'
Common misconceptions
- Thinking the natural isomorphism is directly between and .
- Forgetting that the domain must be the product category to make the curried expressions into valid functors.
Watch the explanation
Connected concepts
Explore next
Related questions
The category is defined as a poset category where the objects are real numbers, and there is a morphism exactly when . This means the morphisms encode the ordinary order relation on the real numbers.
Conditions: Objects are real numbers.; A morphism exists precisely when .
The symbol denotes an isomorphism in the category of sets, which means it is simply a bijection between the two hom-sets. Because hom-sets are sets, their isomorphisms are bijective functions.
Conditions: The compared objects are hom-sets; The ambient category for the isomorphism is the category of sets
The numbers 2 and π are used as concrete examples to illustrate how the inclusion functor and the floor functor act on objects. The lecturer computes and to build intuition for the adjunction before deriving the general inequality equivalence.
Conditions: The example is set in the categories and .; is the inclusion functor .; is the floor functor .
This statement is the concrete order-theoretic consequence of the adjunction between the inclusion functor and the floor functor . It means that for any integer and real number , the inequality holds exactly when holds.
Conditions: must be an integer.; must be a real number.; The equivalence is stated as the consequence of the adjunction example.
In the example, is the inclusion functor from the category of integers to the category of real numbers , and is the floor-function functor from to . The lecturer states that is left adjoint to .
Conditions: Defined between the two order-categories and .; is the inclusion functor .; is the floor-function functor .
Answers are generated from source material and independently checked. Consult the original video or creator if something is unclear.