Skip to content
← All questions

How can we speak of a natural isomorphism if F and G themselves go in opposite directions?

We cannot speak of a natural isomorphism directly between FF and GG because natural isomorphisms compare functors with the same domain and codomain. Instead, the video reformulates the condition: FF and GG are adjoint if and only if the two curried hom-functors B(F(−),−)\mathcal{B}(F(-),-) and A(−,G(−))\mathcal{A}(-,G(-)), both mapping from Aop×B\mathcal{A}^{op} \times \mathcal{B} to SET, are naturally isomorphic.

Conditions

  • F:A→BF:\mathcal{A}\to\mathcal{B} and G:B→AG:\mathcal{B}\to\mathcal{A}
  • Both sides are regarded as functors out of Aop×B\mathcal{A}^{op}\times\mathcal{B}
  • The natural isomorphism is between functors with the same domain and codomain

Reasoning, step by step

  1. Acknowledge that FF and GG go in opposite directions.
  2. Curry the hom-set expressions to form two new functors.
  3. Define the domain of these new functors as Aop×B\mathcal{A}^{op} \times \mathcal{B} and the codomain as SET.
  4. State that adjointness is equivalent to these two new functors being naturally isomorphic.

Example

The board writes: 'i.e. F and G are adjoint iff B(F(−),−)\mathcal{B}(F(-),-), A(−,G(−))\mathcal{A}(-,G(-)): Aop×B→SET\mathcal{A}^{op} \times \mathcal{B} \to SET are naturally isomorphic.'

Common misconceptions

  • Thinking the natural isomorphism is directly between FF and GG.
  • Forgetting that the domain must be the product category Aop×B\mathcal{A}^{op} \times \mathcal{B} to make the curried expressions into valid functors.

Watch the explanation

Connected concepts

Explore next

Related questions

Find a method

↗
Meet the concept

↗
Meet the concept

↗
Meet the concept

↗
Meet the concept

↗

Answers are generated from source material and independently checked. Consult the original video or creator if something is unclear.