Skip to content
← All questions

How do the properties of the supremum and monotonicity combine to trap sequence terms within the interval (L - ε, L]?

First, the supremum property ensures there exists an index NN such that aN>L−ϵa_N > L - \epsilon. Second, monotonicity ensures that for all n>Nn > N, an≥aNa_n \ge a_N, so an>L−ϵa_n > L - \epsilon. Third, since LL is an upper bound for the entire sequence, an≤La_n \le L for all nn. Combining these yields L−ϵ<an≤LL - \epsilon < a_n \le L for all n>Nn > N, trapping the tail of the sequence in this epsilon neighborhood.

Conditions

  • Sequence {an}\{a_n\} is monotone increasing.
  • Sequence {an}\{a_n\} is bounded above by LL.
  • ϵ>0\epsilon > 0 is given.

Reasoning, step by step

  1. Use the definition of supremum to find NN such that aN>L−ϵa_N > L - \epsilon.
  2. Use monotonicity to establish an≥aNa_n \ge a_N for all n>Nn > N.
  3. Combine steps to get an>L−ϵa_n > L - \epsilon for all n>Nn > N.
  4. Use the upper bound property to state an≤La_n \le L for all nn.
  5. Merge inequalities to conclude L−ϵ<an≤LL - \epsilon < a_n \le L for n>Nn > N.

Example

The script derives: 'Combined with the global upper bound an≤La_n \le L, we derive the inequality L−ε<an≤LL - ε < a_n \le L. This confirms that beyond index N, all terms lie within the epsilon neighborhood of L.'

Common misconceptions

  • Forgetting that the lower bound condition only applies for n>Nn > N, not necessarily for all nn.
  • Assuming ana_n equals LL eventually; the inequality allows ana_n to be strictly less than LL.

Watch the explanation

Explore next

Answers are generated from source material and independently checked. Consult the original video or creator if something is unclear.