Skip to content
← All questions

How do you prove that a number is the least upper bound using contradiction?

To prove that β is the least upper bound, assume there is a number γ smaller than β(γ<β)β (γ < β). If γ were an upper bound, it would contradict β being the least. By showing that there exists an element x in S such that x>γx > γ, we prove that γ is not an upper bound. Since any number smaller than β fails to contain the whole set, β is conclusively identified as the supremum.

Conditions

  • β is an upper bound for the set S.
  • γ is a real number such that γ<βγ < β.

Reasoning, step by step

  1. Introduce a new value γ that is strictly less than β.
  2. Assume for the sake of contradiction that γ is an upper bound for S.
  3. Show that there exists an element x in S such that x>γx > γ.
  4. Conclude that γ cannot be an upper bound.
  5. Deduce that β is the least upper bound (supremum) of S.

Example

The animation shows a green line γ introduced just below β. An orange point breaks through γ, proving there exists an element x>γx > γ. Since any number smaller than β fails to contain the whole set, β is conclusively identified as the supremum.

Common misconceptions

  • Believing that finding one element greater than γ is not enough to disprove γ as an upper bound.
  • Thinking that the supremum must be the largest element in the set.

Watch the explanation

Explore next

Answers are generated from source material and independently checked. Consult the original video or creator if something is unclear.