How do you prove that a number is the least upper bound using contradiction?
To prove that β is the least upper bound, assume there is a number γ smaller than . If γ were an upper bound, it would contradict β being the least. By showing that there exists an element x in S such that , we prove that γ is not an upper bound. Since any number smaller than β fails to contain the whole set, β is conclusively identified as the supremum.
Conditions
- β is an upper bound for the set S.
- γ is a real number such that .
Reasoning, step by step
- Introduce a new value γ that is strictly less than β.
- Assume for the sake of contradiction that γ is an upper bound for S.
- Show that there exists an element x in S such that .
- Conclude that γ cannot be an upper bound.
- Deduce that β is the least upper bound (supremum) of S.
Example
The animation shows a green line γ introduced just below β. An orange point breaks through γ, proving there exists an element . Since any number smaller than β fails to contain the whole set, β is conclusively identified as the supremum.
Common misconceptions
- Believing that finding one element greater than γ is not enough to disprove γ as an upper bound.
- Thinking that the supremum must be the largest element in the set.
Watch the explanation
BilibiliSupremum and infimum
0:23 – 0:42Watch this moment ↗
Explore next
Answers are generated from source material and independently checked. Consult the original video or creator if something is unclear.