Skip to content
← All questions

How is a natural transformation between two functors defined?

A natural transformation η\eta between functors FF and GG is defined by assigning a morphism ηx:F(x)→G(x)\eta_x : F(x) \to G(x) in the target category DD for each object xx in the source category CC, such that for every morphism h:x→yh : x \to y in CC, the corresponding square commutes (ηy∘F(h)=G(h)∘ηx\eta_y \circ F(h) = G(h) \circ \eta_x).

Conditions

  • FF and GG are functors from CC to DD.
  • xx and yy are objects in CC.
  • hh is a morphism from xx to yy in CC.

Reasoning, step by step

  1. Define two functors FF and GG from a category CC to a category DD.
  2. For every object xx in CC, specify a morphism ηx\eta_x in DD from F(x)F(x) to G(x)G(x).
  3. For every morphism h:x→yh: x \to y in CC, check the commutativity condition.
  4. Verify that ηy∘F(h)=G(h)∘ηx\eta_y \circ F(h) = G(h) \circ \eta_x holds.
  5. Conclude that η\eta is a natural transformation if and only if all such squares commute.

Example

The video displays the text 'η:homC(F(x),G(x))\eta : hom_C(F(x), G(x))' (noting a likely typo for homDhom_D) along with the commutative square equation ηy∘F(h)=G(h)∘ηx\eta_y \circ F(h) = G(h) \circ \eta_x. The narrator explains that a natural transformation consists of a family of morphisms satisfying this commutative property.

Common misconceptions

  • Ignoring the commutative square condition and only defining the components ηx\eta_x.
  • Placing the components ηx\eta_x in the source category CC instead of the target category DD (as hinted by the typo in the video's notation).
  • Assuming the definition only applies to specific objects and morphisms, rather than universally for all in CC.

Watch the explanation

Connected concepts

Explore next

Related questions

Meet the concept

↗
Understand why

↗
Find a method

↗
Meet the concept

↗

Answers are generated from source material and independently checked. Consult the original video or creator if something is unclear.