Skip to content
← All questions

What is the equivalence relation for fractions in ring localization?

Two fractions r1/s1r_1/s_1 and r2/s2r_2/s_2 in the localization S−1RS^{-1}R are defined to be equivalent if there exists an element tt in the multiplicatively closed set SS such that t(r1s2−s1r2)=0t(r_1s_2 - s_1r_2) = 0. This relation ensures that the fractions represent the same element in the localization.

Conditions

  • RR is a commutative ring.
  • S⊂RS \subset R is a multiplicatively closed subset.
  • r1,r2∈Rr_1, r_2 \in R and s1,s2∈Ss_1, s_2 \in S.

Reasoning, step by step

  1. Identify two fractions r1/s1r_1/s_1 and r2/s2r_2/s_2.
  2. Compute the cross-product difference r1s2−s1r2r_1s_2 - s_1r_2.
  3. Check if there exists t∈St \in S such that t(r1s2−s1r2)=0t(r_1s_2 - s_1r_2) = 0.
  4. If such a tt exists, declare the fractions equivalent.

Example

The board writes ∃t∈S:t(r1s2−s1r2)=0\exists t \in S : t(r_1s_2 - s_1r_2) = 0, and the speaker states that if there exists such an element, then these fractions are equivalent.

Common misconceptions

  • Assuming the equivalence relation is simply r1s2=s1r2r_1s_2 = s_1r_2 without the annihilator tt.
  • Thinking that the equivalence relation does not depend on the multiplicatively closed set SS.

Watch the explanation

Connected concepts

Explore next

Related questions

Understand why

↗
Meet the concept

↗

Answers are generated from source material and independently checked. Consult the original video or creator if something is unclear.