Skip to content
← All questions

What is the explicit formula for the antiderivative of a holomorphic function used in this proof?

The explicit formula for the antiderivative F(z)F(z) of a holomorphic function ff on a domain DD is given by the contour integral of f(w)f(w) along a path γz\gamma_z from a fixed base point z0z_0 to zz. The formula is F(z):=∫γzf(w)dwF(z) := \int_{\gamma_z} f(w) dw.

Conditions

  • The function f is holomorphic on the domain D.
  • The domain D is simply connected (ensuring path independence).
  • A base point z0z_0 is fixed in D.
  • γz\gamma_z is a path in D from z0z_0 to z.

Reasoning, step by step

  1. Fix an arbitrary base point z0z_0 inside the domain D.
  2. For any point z∈Dz \in D, let γz\gamma_z be a path lying entirely within D that starts at z0z_0 and ends at zz.
  3. Define the function F(z)F(z) as the integral of f along this path: F(z):=∫γzf(w)dwF(z) := \int_{\gamma_z} f(w) dw.
  4. Verify that this definition is well-defined due to the path independence guaranteed by the simply connected domain and holomorphicity of f.

Example

The board shows the formula F(z):=∫γzf(w)dwF(z) := \int_{\gamma_z} f(w) dw, and the speaker explains, 'We can construct such a function F using contour integration... We then define the function F(z)F(z) as the integral of f along this path'.

Common misconceptions

  • Assuming the antiderivative is defined by an indefinite integral without specifying a base point and path.
  • Thinking the formula applies to any continuous function, ignoring the necessity of holomorphicity and a simply connected domain for path independence.

Watch the explanation

Explore next

Answers are generated from source material and independently checked. Consult the original video or creator if something is unclear.