Skip to content
← All questions

Why does solving fW=σff_W=\sigma f introduce a function ϕ(t)\phi(t) rather than a constant?

When solving fW=σff_W = \sigma f with respect to WW, the variable tt is treated as a parameter. Therefore, the 'constant' of integration can be any function of tt, denoted as φ(t)\varphi(t).

Conditions

  • The equation is solved with respect to WW.
  • tt is held fixed during the integration.

Reasoning, step by step

  1. Identify the equation fW=σff_W = \sigma f as an ODE in WW.
  2. Integrate with respect to WW, yielding eσWe^{\sigma W} multiplied by a constant.
  3. Recognize that since tt was a parameter, the constant can depend on tt.
  4. Denote this tt-dependent constant as φ(t)\varphi(t).

Example

The board shows f(W,t)=φ(t)eσWf(W,t) = \varphi(t)e^{\sigma W}, and the lecturer notes that φ(t)\varphi(t) is an arbitrary function of time.

Common misconceptions

  • Treating the integration constant as a strict numerical constant.
  • Forgetting that partial differentiation with respect to one variable leaves the other variables as parameters.

Watch the explanation

Connected concepts

Explore next

Related questions

Find a method

↗
Meet the concept

↗
Meet the concept

↗
Find a method

↗
Find a method

↗

Answers are generated from source material and independently checked. Consult the original video or creator if something is unclear.