Skip to content
← All questions

Why does the epsilon-delta definition require x to not equal a?

The definition requires x≠ax \neq a (expressed as 0<∣x−a∣0 < |x - a|) because the limit describes the behavior of the function *as it approaches* the point aa, not its value *at* the point aa. The function might be undefined at x=ax = a, or its value f(a)f(a) might differ from the limit LL. Excluding x=ax = a ensures the limit depends only on the surrounding values.

Conditions

  • The limit is concerned with the trend of f(x)f(x) near aa.
  • f(a)f(a) may be undefined or discontinuous at aa.

Reasoning, step by step

  1. Recognize that the limit LL is the value f(x)f(x) approaches as x→ax \to a.
  2. Understand that the actual value f(a)f(a) is irrelevant to the limit's existence or value.
  3. Apply the condition 0<∣x−a∣0 < |x - a| to restrict the domain to a punctured neighborhood of aa.
  4. Conclude that this exclusion allows the limit to exist even if the function has a hole or jump at aa.

Example

The speaker explicitly states, 'the one thing I can't guarantee you is what happens when x is equal to a.' The board shows the condition 0<∣x−a∣<δ0<|x-a|<\delta, which mathematically enforces x≠ax \neq a.

Common misconceptions

  • Believing that the limit depends on the function's value exactly at x=ax = a.
  • Thinking that a function must be defined at aa for the limit to exist.
  • Confusing the limit of a function with its continuity at a point.

Watch the explanation

Explore next

Answers are generated from source material and independently checked. Consult the original video or creator if something is unclear.