Skip to content
← All questions

Why is hom⁡(U,hom⁡(V,W))\hom(U, \hom(V, W)) isomorphic to hom⁡(U⊗V,W)\hom(U \otimes V, W)?

The isomorphism hom⁡(U,hom⁡(V,W))≅hom⁡(U⊗V,W)\hom(U, \hom(V, W)) \cong \hom(U \otimes V, W) reflects the adjoint/duality relationship between Hom and tensor product. A linear map from UU to the space of linear maps from VV to WW corresponds to a bilinear map from U×VU \times V to WW, which in turn corresponds to a linear map from the tensor product space U⊗VU \otimes V to WW.

Conditions

  • U,V,WU, V, W are linear spaces over the number field P\mathbb{P}.
  • hom⁡(X,Y)\hom(X,Y) denotes the vector space of all linear maps from XX to YY.

Reasoning, step by step

  1. Interpret hom⁡(V,W)\hom(V,W) as the linear space of all linear maps from VV to WW.
  2. Interpret hom⁡(U,hom⁡(V,W))\hom(U,\hom(V,W)) as the space of linear maps from UU to this mapping space.
  3. Recognize that a linear map from UU to hom⁡(V,W)\hom(V,W) is equivalent to a bilinear map from U×VU \times V to WW.
  4. Apply the universal property of the tensor product to map this bilinear map to a unique linear map from U⊗VU \otimes V to WW.
  5. Conclude the isomorphism between the two Hom spaces.

Example

The video states: 'Let U, V, W be linear spaces over the number field P. Then hom⁡(U,hom⁡(V,W))≅hom⁡(U⊗V,W)\hom(U, \hom(V, W)) \cong \hom(U \otimes V, W).' The instructor calls this 'a duality relation between Hom and tensor product.'

Common misconceptions

  • Misinterpreting hom⁡(U,V)\hom(U,V) as a specific linear map rather than the vector space of all such maps.
  • Assuming the video provides a rigorous proof for this isomorphism; the video only states and conceptually explains it.

Watch the explanation

Connected concepts

Explore next

Related questions

Understand why

↗
Meet the concept

↗
Meet the concept

↗
Understand why

↗
Understand why

↗

Answers are generated from source material and independently checked. Consult the original video or creator if something is unclear.