Skip to content
Back to exploration
Geometry / English

Riemannian Geometry_Part 2_Riemannian metrics_John Lee_Introduction to Riemannian Manifolds p01 11_Riemannian metrics

Fraljimetry的数学工厂 · Bilibili · 6:58

Open original
READ & KEEP

The explanation, unpacked.

Saves 0

Reviewed learning material · Video analysis · English
Read the full overview

This video segment introduces the definition of a linear isometry between two inner product spaces. The speaker explains that such a map must be a vector space isomorphism (preserving addition and scalar multiplication) and must preserve inner products. The segment concludes by noting that this concept will be generalized to manifolds via tangent spaces to study Riemannian metrics. This video segment introduces the concept of a Riemannian metric on a smooth manifold. It begins by reviewing the definition of a linear isometry between inner product spaces, which preserves inner products. The speaker then extends this geometric notion to abstract smooth manifolds by defining a Riemannian metric as a smooth covariant 2-tensor field. This field assigns an inner product to the tangent space at each point of the manifold, ensuring the metric is symmetric and positive definite. This video segment provides the formal definition of a Riemannian metric on a smooth manifold. The instructor explains that a Riemannian metric is a smooth, symmetric, covariant 2-tensor field that assigns a positive-definite inner product to each tangent space. Key properties such as linearity over smooth functions (allowing coefficient functions to be pulled out) and the local nature of smoothness are detailed. The concept of the tangent bundle, defined as the disjoint union of all tangent spaces, is also introduced as the natural domain for the metric. This 58-second whiteboard lecture segment defines a Riemannian metric g on a smooth manifold M as a smooth covariant 2-tensor field whose value gpg_p at each point p is an inner product on the tangent space T_pM. The lecturer explains the two highlighted consequences written on the board: symmetry, expressed verbally as g(x,y)=g(y,x)g(x,y)=g(y,x), and positive definiteness, expressed as gp(v,v)≥0g_p(v,v) \ge 0 with equality to 0 iff v=0v=0. The pair (M,g) is then named a Riemannian manifold. In the last seconds, the page scrolls to the proposition that every smooth manifold admits a Riemannian metric and reveals the beginning of the proof strategy using a partition of unity, an atlas A\mathcal{A}, and local tensors This formula needs review. Please report it using the page feedback control.alpha = ∑i\sum_i du_\alpha^i⊗i \otimes du_\alpha^i.

Use the learning inspector for key ideas and moments, or open the reading tabs for the complete notes.

Chapters

0:00Review of Prerequisites0:28Definition of Linear Isometry0:49Preserving Inner Products1:13Vector Space Isomorphism Conditions1:36Generalization to Manifolds2:00Linear Isometry Definition2:15Introduction to Riemannian Metrics2:22Defining Riemannian Metrics on Smooth Manifolds4:00Definition of Riemannian Metric4:35Tensor Field Properties and Linearity5:02Local Smoothness5:23Tangent Spaces and Tangent Bundle6:00Definition of a Riemannian metric6:12Symmetry from the inner-product condition6:20Positive definiteness of gpg_p6:33Definition of a Riemannian manifold6:50Existence proposition and proof setup

Learning script

Generated from the video's visuals and explanation; not verbatim speech.

The video begins by scrolling through handwritten notes reviewing fundamental linear algebra concepts: inner products, norms, the polarization identity, orthogonal complements, orthonormal bases, and the Gram-Schmidt algorithm.

The focus shifts to the definition of a linear isometry. Let VV and WW be inner product spaces. A map F:V→WF: V \to W is defined as a linear isometry if it satisfies two main conditions.

First, FF must preserve inner products. This means that for any vectors a,b∈Va, b \in V, the inner product in the domain space equals the inner product of their images in the codomain space: ⟨a,b⟩V=⟨F(a),F(b)⟩W\langle a, b \rangle_V = \langle F(a), F(b) \rangle_W.

Second, FF must be a vector space isomorphism. This requires preserving vector addition and scalar multiplication: F(a+b)=F(a)+F(b)F(a+b) = F(a) + F(b) and F(ka)=kF(a)F(ka) = kF(a) for any scalar kk.

Finally, the speaker notes that this concept of linear isometry between vector spaces will be generalized to abstract manifolds. Since manifolds lack global inner product spaces, isometries between them will be defined using their tangent spaces and differential mappings, which is crucial for studying Riemannian metrics.

The segment starts by recalling the definition of a linear isometry. A map F:V→WF: V \to W between inner product spaces VV and WW is a linear isometry if it is a vector space isomorphism that preserves inner products. This preservation of inner products ensures that all geometric properties derived from them are maintained.

The focus then shifts to extending these concepts to abstract smooth manifolds. Since a manifold does not have a single global vector space, the approach is to assign an inner product to the tangent space at each point. This assignment must vary smoothly across the manifold.

This leads to the formal definition of a Riemannian metric. Let MM be a smooth manifold. A Riemannian metric gg on MM is defined as a smooth covariant 2-tensor field. For any point p∈Mp \in M, the value gpg_p is an inner product on the tangent space TpMT_pM. Consequently, gg is a symmetric 2-tensor field that is positive definite, meaning gp(v,v)≥0g_p(v,v) \ge 0 for all v∈TpMv \in T_pM, and gp(v,v)=0g_p(v,v) = 0 if and only if v=0v = 0.

The term 'covariant' is explained to mean that the tensor field takes vectors as inputs and outputs a scalar number. This property is fundamental to how the metric operates on the tangent spaces of the manifold.

The video begins with the formal definition of a Riemannian metric gg on a smooth manifold MM. The text on screen states that gg is a smooth covariant 2-tensor field, denoted as being in T2(M)\mathcal{T}^2(M).

The instructor elaborates on the inputs of this tensor field. He writes C∞(M)C^\infty(M) to denote the space of smooth functions. He explains that if XX is a vector field and ff is a smooth function, then fXfX is also a vector field.

A key property of tensor fields is discussed: linearity over the ring of smooth functions. The instructor writes the equation g(fX,hY)=fhg(X,Y)g(fX, hY) = fh g(X,Y), showing that smooth coefficient functions ff and hh can be 'pulled out' of the tensor evaluation.

The term 'smooth' in the definition is clarified. The instructor explains that this means locally, when expressed in a coordinate chart, the components of the metric are smooth functions in the Euclidean sense.

The focus shifts to the domain of the vectors. The instructor corrects a slip of the tongue, emphasizing that the vectors vv belong to the tangent space TpMT_pM at a point pp, not the tensor field itself. The metric gpg_p provides an inner product on this specific tangent space.

Finally, the concept of the tangent bundle TMTM is introduced. The instructor writes TM=⨆p∈MTpMTM = \bigsqcup_{p \in M} T_pM, defining it as the disjoint union of all tangent spaces over the manifold MM, which naturally inherits a smooth manifold structure.

The clip opens on a handwritten definition: let MM be a smooth manifold, and a Riemannian metric gg on MM is a smooth covariant 2-tensor field whose value gpg_p at each p∈Mp \in M is an inner product on TpMT_pM. The lecturer immediately unpacks what that means pointwise.

Because each gpg_p is an inner product, the form is symmetric. In the spoken explanation this is written as g(x,y)=g(y,x)g(x,y)=g(y,x) for two vectors xx and yy, which is why the board calls gg a symmetric 2-tensor field.

The second required property is positive definiteness. The board states it exactly as gp(v,v)≥0g_p(v,v) \ge 0 and gp(v,v)=0⇔v=0g_p(v,v)=0 \Leftrightarrow v=0, so the quadratic expression is never negative and vanishes only on the zero tangent vector.

With these two conditions in place, the lecturer names the resulting geometric object: when a smooth manifold MM is endowed with a Riemannian metric gg, the pair (M,g)(M,g) is called a Riemannian manifold. This is identified as the main object of study.

The page then scrolls down to the next topic, the proposition that every smooth manifold admits a Riemannian metric. The visible proof begins by saying to use a partition of unity, choosing an atlas A={Fα:Uα→Qα⊆Rn}\mathcal{A}=\{F_\alpha: U_\alpha \to Q_\alpha \subseteq \mathbb{R}^n\}, taking functions ρα:Uα→[0,1]\rho_\alpha: U_\alpha \to [0,1] subordinate to it, and defining local tensors δα=∑iduαi⊗duαi\delta_\alpha = \sum_i du_\alpha^i \otimes du_\alpha^i.

Knowledge cards

01

Definition of Linear Isometry

A map F:V→WF: V \to W between two inner product spaces is a linear isometry if it is a vector space isomorphism that preserves inner products.

⟨a,b⟩V=⟨F(a),F(b)⟩W\langle a, b \rangle_V = \langle F(a), F(b) \rangle_W
02

Vector Space Isomorphism Conditions

For FF to be a vector space isomorphism, it must preserve addition and scalar multiplication.

F(a+b)=F(a)+F(b),F(ka)=kF(a)F(a+b) = F(a) + F(b), \quad F(ka) = kF(a)
03

Generalization to Manifolds

The concept of linear isometry is extended to manifolds by applying it to tangent spaces via differential mappings, forming the basis for Riemannian metrics.

04

Linear Isometry

A map F:V→WF: V \to W between inner product spaces VV and WW is a linear isometry if it is a vector space isomorphism that preserves inner products. This means it maintains the geometric structure defined by the inner product.

F:V→WF: V \to W
05

Riemannian Metric

On a smooth manifold MM, a Riemannian metric gg is a smooth covariant 2-tensor field. At each point p∈Mp \in M, gpg_p is an inner product on the tangent space TpMT_pM. It is symmetric and positive definite: gp(v,v)≥0g_p(v,v) \ge 0 and gp(v,v)=0  ⟺  v=0g_p(v,v) = 0 \iff v = 0.

g∈T2(M)g \in T^2(M)
06

Covariant Tensor Field

A covariant tensor field takes vectors as inputs and produces a scalar number as output. In the context of a Riemannian metric, it operates on pairs of vectors from the tangent space at a given point.

07

Riemannian Metric Definition

A Riemannian metric gg on a smooth manifold MM is a smooth covariant 2-tensor field. At each point p∈Mp \in M, its value gpg_p is an inner product on the tangent space TpMT_pM. This means gg is symmetric and positive definite: gp(v,v)≥0g_p(v,v) \ge 0 with equality if and only if v=0v=0.

gp(v,v)≥0,gp(v,v)=0  ⟺  v=0g_p(v,v) \ge 0, \quad g_p(v,v)=0 \iff v=0
08

Linearity of Tensor Fields

As a covariant tensor field, the Riemannian metric is linear over smooth functions. If X,YX, Y are vector fields and f,hf, h are smooth functions, the metric satisfies the property that scalar functions can be factored out of the arguments.

g(fX,hY)=fhg(X,Y)g(fX, hY) = f h g(X,Y)
09

Local Smoothness Condition

The requirement that the metric gg is 'smooth' means that in any local coordinate chart on the manifold, the component functions of the metric tensor are infinitely differentiable (smooth) as functions on Euclidean space.

10

Tangent Bundle Construction

The tangent bundle TMTM is the collection of all tangent spaces of the manifold MM. It is defined set-theoretically as the disjoint union of TpMT_pM for all points pp in MM. The Riemannian metric assigns an inner product to each fiber of this bundle.

TM=⨆p∈MTpMTM = \bigsqcup_{p \in M} T_pM
11

Riemannian metric

A Riemannian metric on a smooth manifold MM is a smooth covariant 2-tensor field gg such that for every point p∈Mp \in M, the value gpg_p is an inner product on the tangent space TpMT_pM. The lecturer emphasizes the pointwise nature of this definition by circling gpg_p and TpMT_pM on the board.

gp is an inner product on TpMg_p \text{ is an inner product on } T_pM
12

Symmetry of the metric

Because each gpg_p is an inner product, the tensor field is symmetric. The spoken explanation gives the relation g(x,y)=g(y,x)g(x,y)=g(y,x) for vectors xx and yy, matching the board phrase "symmetric 2-tensor field".

g(x,y)=g(y,x)g(x,y)=g(y,x)
13

Positive definiteness

The metric is positive definite in the pointwise sense that evaluating it on a tangent vector against itself gives a nonnegative number, and the value is zero exactly for the zero vector. This is the condition underlined on the board.

gp(v,v)≥0,gp(v,v)=0⇔v=0g_p(v,v) \ge 0, \quad g_p(v,v)=0 \Leftrightarrow v=0
14

Riemannian manifold

Once a smooth manifold MM is equipped with a Riemannian metric gg, the pair (M,g)(M,g) is called a Riemannian manifold. The lecturer identifies this as the central object studied in the course.

(M,g)(M,g)
15

Existence proposition

The next result announced on the board is that every smooth manifold admits a Riemannian metric. The clip shows the proposition statement and the start of its proof, but not the full argument.

Every smooth manifold admits a Riemannian metric.\text{Every smooth manifold admits a Riemannian metric.}
16

Proof setup using partition of unity

The visible proof strategy begins by choosing an atlas A={Fα:Uα→Qα⊆Rn}\mathcal{A}=\{F_\alpha: U_\alpha \to Q_\alpha \subseteq \mathbb{R}^n\} of MM, taking a partition of unity {ρα:Uα→[0,1]}\{\rho_\alpha: U_\alpha \to [0,1]\} subordinate to that atlas, and defining local tensors δα=∑iduαi⊗duαi\delta_\alpha = \sum_i du_\alpha^i \otimes du_\alpha^i on the coordinate charts.

δα=∑iduαi⊗duαi\delta_\alpha = \sum_i du_\alpha^i \otimes du_\alpha^i

Detailed learning notes

Explore conditions, steps and evidence. Supplementary explanations are labeled separately from content shown in the video.

Symbols · 42

V

Clear evidence
Shown in the video
Evidence
  1. Formula
    Observation

    Written as V in the definition of linear isometry.

Symbol

V

Meaning

An inner product space.

Domain

Inner product space

W

Clear evidence
Shown in the video
Evidence
  1. Formula
    Observation

    Written as W in the definition of linear isometry.

Symbol

W

Meaning

Another inner product space.

Domain

Inner product space

F

Clear evidence
Shown in the video
Evidence
  1. Formula
    Observation

    Written as F: V→WV \to W.

Symbol

F

Meaning

A map between two inner product spaces.

Domain

Map from V to W

a, b

Clear evidence
Shown in the video
Evidence
  1. Formula
    Observation

    Written as a, b in the inner product preservation equation.

Symbol

a, b

Meaning

Arbitrary vectors in V.

Domain

Vectors in V

k

Clear evidence
Shown in the video
Evidence
  1. Formula
    Observation

    Written as k in the linearity condition F(ka) = kF(a).

Symbol

k

Meaning

A scalar in the underlying field.

Domain

Field

V

Clear evidence
Shown in the video
Evidence
  1. Formula
    Observation

    The handwritten text reads "Let V, W be inner product spaces."

Symbol

V

Meaning

An inner product space.

Domain

Inner product space

W

Clear evidence
Shown in the video
Evidence
  1. Formula
    Observation

    The handwritten text reads "Let V, W be inner product spaces."

Symbol

W

Meaning

An inner product space.

Domain

Inner product space

F

Clear evidence
Shown in the video
Evidence
  1. Formula
    Observation

    The handwritten text reads "A map F: V -> W is called a linear isometry..."

Symbol

F

Meaning

A map between inner product spaces.

Domain

Map from V to W

M

Clear evidence
Shown in the video
Evidence
  1. Formula
    Observation

    The handwritten text reads "Let M be a smooth manifold."

Symbol

M

Meaning

A smooth manifold.

Domain

Smooth manifold

g

Clear evidence
Shown in the video
Evidence
  1. Formula
    Observation

    The handwritten text reads "A Riemannian metric g on M is a smooth covariant 2-tensor field..."

Symbol

g

Meaning

A Riemannian metric on M.

Domain

Smooth covariant 2-tensor field on M

T2(M)T^2(M)

Clear evidence
Shown in the video
Evidence
  1. Formula
    Observation

    The handwritten text reads "(in T2(M)T^2(M))".

Symbol

T2(M)T^2(M)

Meaning

The space of covariant 2-tensor fields on M.

Domain

Space of tensor fields

p

Clear evidence
Shown in the video
Evidence
  1. Formula
    Observation

    The handwritten text reads "whose value gpg_p at p∈Mp \in M..."

Symbol

p

Meaning

A point on the smooth manifold M.

Domain

Point in M

Knowledge points · 11

Definition of Linear Isometry

Clear evidence
Shown in the video
Evidence
  1. Formula
    Observation

    Text on screen: 'Let V, W be inner product spaces. A map F: V→WV \to W is called a linear isometry if it is a vector space isomorphism that preserves inner products.'

  2. Audio
    Observation

    Speaker reads the definition and explains the conditions.

Definition
Explanation

A linear isometry is a map between two inner product spaces that is both a vector space isomorphism and preserves inner products.

Formula
⟨a,b⟩V=⟨F(a),F(b)⟩W\langle a, b \rangle_V = \langle F(a), F(b) \rangle_W
Conditions
  1. V and W are inner product spaces.

  2. F is a vector space isomorphism.

  3. F preserves inner products for all a, b∈Vb \in V.

Conditions for Vector Space Isomorphism

Clear evidence
Shown in the video
Evidence
  1. Formula
    Observation

    Written equations: F(a+b)=F(a)+F(b)F(a+b) = F(a) + F(b) and F(ka) = kF(a).

  2. Audio
    Observation

    Speaker states these are the conditions for being a vector space isomorphism.

Method
Explanation

To be a vector space isomorphism, the map must preserve vector addition and scalar multiplication.

Formula
F(a+b)=F(a)+F(b),F(ka)=kF(a)F(a+b) = F(a) + F(b), \quad F(ka) = kF(a)
Conditions
  1. a, b∈Vb \in V

  2. k is a scalar in the field

Linear Isometry

Clear evidence
Shown in the video
Evidence
  1. Formula
    Observation

    The handwritten text defines a linear isometry: "Let V, W be inner product spaces. A map F: V -> W is called a linear isometry if it is a vector space isomorphism that preserves inner products."

Definition
Explanation

A linear isometry is defined as a map between two inner product spaces that is both a vector space isomorphism and preserves inner products.

Formula
F:V→WF: V \to W
Conditions
  1. V and W are inner product spaces.

  2. F is a vector space isomorphism.

  3. F preserves inner products.

Riemannian Metric

Clear evidence
Shown in the video
Evidence
  1. Formula
    Observation

    The handwritten text defines a Riemannian metric: "Let M be a smooth manifold. A Riemannian metric g on M is a smooth covariant 2-tensor field (in T2(M)T^2(M)), whose value gpg_p at p∈Mp \in M is an inner product on T_pM. Thus g is a symmetric 2-tensor field that is positive definite in the sense that gp(v,v)≥0g_p(v,v) \ge 0, gp(v,v)=0  ⟺  v=0g_p(v,v)=0 \iff v=0."

  2. Audio
    Observation

    The speaker explains that a Riemannian metric is a smooth covariant 2-tensor field and elaborates on the meaning of 'covariant' and 'tensor'.

Definition
Explanation

A Riemannian metric on a smooth manifold is a smooth covariant 2-tensor field whose value at each point is an inner product on the tangent space at that point. It is symmetric and positive definite.

Formula
g∈T2(M)g \in T^2(M)
Conditions
  1. M is a smooth manifold.

  2. g is a smooth covariant 2-tensor field.

  3. For each p∈Mp \in M, gpg_p is an inner product on T_pM.

  4. gp(v,v)≥0g_p(v,v) \ge 0 for all v∈Tv \in T_pM.

  5. gp(v,v)=0g_p(v,v) = 0 if and only if v=0v = 0.

Prerequisites
  1. Linear Isometry

Definition of Riemannian Metric

Clear evidence
Shown in the video
Evidence
  1. Formula
    Observation

    The handwritten definition of a Riemannian metric is visible throughout the clip.

Definition
Explanation

A Riemannian metric g on a smooth manifold M is defined as a smooth covariant 2-tensor field whose value at each point p is an inner product on the tangent space T_pM. It must be symmetric and positive definite.

Formula
gp(v,v)≥0,gp(v,v)=0  ⟺  v=0g_p(v,v) \ge 0, \quad g_p(v,v)=0 \iff v=0
Conditions
  1. M is a smooth manifold

  2. g is a smooth covariant 2-tensor field

  3. gpg_p is an inner product on T_pM for all p∈Mp \in M

Linearity Property of Tensor Fields

Clear evidence
Shown in the video
Evidence
  1. Audio
    Observation

    The speaker explains that a tensor field allows coefficient functions to be pulled out.

  2. Formula
    Observation

    The speaker writes the equation g(fX, hY) = fh g(X,Y)g(X,Y).

Method
Explanation

For a covariant 2-tensor field g, it is linear over the ring of smooth functions. This means that if you multiply the input vector fields by smooth functions, those functions can be factored out of the tensor evaluation.

Formula
g(fX,hY)=fhg(X,Y)g(fX, hY) = f h g(X,Y)
Conditions
  1. g is a covariant 2-tensor field

  2. X, Y are vector fields

  3. f, h are smooth functions

Prerequisites
  1. Definition of Riemannian Metric

Meaning of Smoothness for Tensor Fields

Clear evidence
Shown in the video
Evidence
  1. Audio
    Observation

    The speaker states that 'smooth' means locally in a chart it is smooth in Euclidean space.

Definition
Explanation

The smoothness of a tensor field like a Riemannian metric is defined locally. In any local coordinate chart, the component functions of the tensor must be smooth (infinitely differentiable) as functions on Euclidean space.

Formula
Conditions
  1. Applicable in local coordinates

Prerequisites
  1. Definition of Riemannian Metric

Definition of Tangent Bundle

Clear evidence
Shown in the video
Evidence
  1. Formula
    Observation

    The speaker writes TM = ⨆p∈MT\bigsqcup_{p \in M} T_pM.

  2. Audio
    Observation

    The speaker defines the tangent bundle as the disjoint union of all tangent spaces.

Definition
Explanation

The tangent bundle TM of a manifold M is the disjoint union of all tangent spaces T_pM for every point p in M. It naturally inherits a smooth manifold structure from M.

Formula
TM=⨆p∈MTpMTM = \bigsqcup_{p \in M} T_pM
Conditions
  1. M is a smooth manifold

Prerequisites
  1. Definition of Riemannian Metric

Definition of a Riemannian metric

Clear evidence
Shown in the video
Evidence
  1. Formula
    Observation

    The board states: "Let M be a smooth manifold. A Riemannian metric g on M is a smooth covariant 2-tensor field (in T2(M)\mathcal{T}^2(M)), whose value gpg_p at p∈Mp \in M is an inner product on T_pM. Thus g is a symmetric 2-tensor field that is positive definite in the sense that gp(v,v)≥0g_p(v,v) \ge 0, gp(v,v)=0⇔v=0g_p(v,v)=0 \Leftrightarrow v=0."

  2. Audio
    Observation

    The lecturer explains that g is symmetric because its restriction to each p is an inner product on the tangent space, and adds that it is positive definite because gp(v,v)g_p(v,v) is nonnegative and equals zero iff v=0v=0.

Definition
Explanation

A Riemannian metric on a smooth manifold M is defined as a smooth covariant 2-tensor field g such that at every point p∈Mp \in M, the value gpg_p is an inner product on the tangent space T_pM. The lecturer unpacks this by saying that g must be symmetric and positive definite pointwise.

Formula
gp(v,v)≥0,gp(v,v)=0⇔v=0g_p(v,v) \ge 0, \quad g_p(v,v)=0 \Leftrightarrow v=0
Conditions
  1. M is a smooth manifold.

  2. g is a smooth covariant 2-tensor field.

  3. For each p∈Mp \in M, gpg_p is an inner product on T_pM.

  4. Symmetry is stated verbally as g(x,y)=g(y,x)g(x,y)=g(y,x).

  5. Positive definiteness is stated pointwise on tangent vectors v∈Tv \in T_pM.

Definition of a Riemannian manifold

Clear evidence
Shown in the video
Evidence
  1. Formula
    Observation

    The board writes: "Endowed with a Riemannian metric, (M,g) is called a Riemannian manifold."

  2. Audio
    Observation

    The lecturer says that when a smooth manifold M is endowed with a Riemannian metric, one calls this a Riemannian manifold, and that this is the object studied in the course.

Definition
Explanation

Once a smooth manifold M is equipped with a Riemannian metric g, the pair (M,g) is called a Riemannian manifold. This is the main object of study introduced in the clip.

Formula
(M,g)(M,g)
Conditions
  1. M is a smooth manifold.

  2. g is a Riemannian metric on M.

Prerequisites
  1. Definition of a Riemannian metric

Existence proposition and proof setup

Clear evidence
Shown in the video
Evidence
  1. Formula
    Observation

    The board shows the heading "[Prop, Existence of Riemannian metric]" and the statement "Every smooth manifold admits a Riemannian metric."

  2. Audio
    Observation

    The lecturer says, "In the next part we will study the existence of Riemannian metrics."

  3. Formula
    Observation

    The lower page begins the proof with "Rmk: Use a partition of unity." followed by an atlas and subordinate partition of unity.

Uncertainties
  1. Only the beginning of the proof is visible before the clip ends; the full argument is not contained in this segment.

Method
Explanation

The clip introduces the proposition that every smooth manifold admits a Riemannian metric and begins the proof strategy by saying to use a partition of unity. The visible setup chooses an atlas A\mathcal{A} of M and a partition of unity \{This formula needs review. Please report it using the page feedback control.alpha\} subordinate to it, then defines a local tensor This formula needs review. Please report it using the page feedback control.alpha = ∑i\sum_i du_\alpha^i⊗i \otimes du_\alpha^i on each chart.

Formula
δα=∑iduαi⊗duαi\delta_\alpha = \sum_i du_\alpha^i \otimes du_\alpha^i
Conditions
  1. M is a smooth manifold.

  2. The proof uses an atlas A\mathcal{A}=\{FαF_\alpha: Uα→Qα⊆RnU_\alpha \to Q_\alpha \subseteq \mathbb{R}^n\}.

  3. It also uses a partition of unity \{This formula needs review. Please report it using the page feedback control.alpha: Uα→[0,1]U_\alpha \to [0,1]\} subordinate to A\mathcal{A}.

Prerequisites
  1. Definition of a Riemannian metric
Claims and conditions · 3

Positive Definiteness of Riemannian Metric

Clear evidence
Shown in the video
Evidence
  1. Formula
    Observation

    The handwritten text explicitly states the conditions for positive definiteness.

Proposition
Statement

A Riemannian metric g is positive definite, meaning for any tangent vector v, gp(v,v)≥0g_p(v,v) \ge 0, and gp(v,v)=0g_p(v,v) = 0 if and only if v=0v = 0.

Hypotheses
  1. g is a Riemannian metric on M

  2. v∈Tv \in T_pM

Quantifiers

∀p∈M\forall p \in M, ∀v∈T\forall v \in T_pM

Symmetry of Riemannian Metric

Clear evidence
Shown in the video
Evidence
  1. Formula
    Observation

    The handwritten text describes g as a 'symmetric 2-tensor field'.

Proposition
Statement

A Riemannian metric g is a symmetric 2-tensor field, implying g(X,Y)=g(Y,X)g(X,Y) = g(Y,X) for any vector fields X and Y.

Hypotheses
  1. g is a Riemannian metric on M

  2. X, Y are vector fields on M

Quantifiers

∀X\forall X, Y∈X(M)Y \in \mathfrak{X}(M)

Existence of Riemannian metrics on smooth manifolds

Clear evidence
Shown in the video
Evidence
  1. Formula
    Observation

    The board explicitly states: "Every smooth manifold admits a Riemannian metric."

  2. Audio
    Observation

    The lecturer announces that the next part will study the existence of Riemannian metrics.

Uncertainties
  1. The proof is only initiated in this clip and is not completed within the provided duration.

Theorem
Statement

Every smooth manifold admits a Riemannian metric.

Hypotheses
  1. M is a smooth manifold.

Quantifiers

For every smooth manifold M, there exists a Riemannian metric g on M.

Derivations and proofs · 5

Derivation of Inner Product Preservation Condition

Clear evidence
Shown in the video
Evidence
  1. Formula
    Observation

    Written equation: ⟨a\langle a, b⟩V=⟨F(a)b \rangle_V = \langle F(a), F(b)⟩WF(b) \rangle_W.

  2. Audio
    Observation

    Speaker explains that picking two vectors a and b and taking their inner products in V equals taking the inner product of their images in W.

Intuitive argument
Steps
  1. Expression
    ⟨a,b⟩V\langle a, b \rangle_V
    Explanation

    Take the inner product of two arbitrary vectors a and b in the domain space V.

    Justification

    Definition of inner product space.

    Shown in the video
  2. Expression
    ⟨F(a),F(b)⟩W\langle F(a), F(b) \rangle_W
    Explanation

    Take the inner product of their mapped images F(a)F(a) and F(b)F(b) in the codomain space W.

    Justification

    Definition of inner product space.

    Shown in the video
  3. Expression
    ⟨a,b⟩V=⟨F(a),F(b)⟩W\langle a, b \rangle_V = \langle F(a), F(b) \rangle_W
    Explanation

    Equate the two inner products to define the preservation property.

    Justification

    Condition for linear isometry.

    Shown in the video
Conclusion

The map F preserves the geometric structure measured by the inner product.

Derivation of Tensor Field Linearity

Clear evidence
Shown in the video
Evidence
  1. Audio
    Observation

    The speaker derives the property by explaining how coefficients are pulled out.

  2. Formula
    Observation

    The speaker writes the final equation g(fX, hY) = fh g(X,Y)g(X,Y).

Intuitive argument
Steps
  1. Expression
    g(fX,hY)g(fX, hY)
    Explanation

    Start with the tensor g evaluated on scaled vector fields fX and hY.

    Justification

    Definition of the inputs to the tensor field.

    Shown in the video
  2. Expression
    =fhg(X,Y)= f h g(X,Y)
    Explanation

    Pull out the scalar functions f and h from their respective arguments.

    Justification

    Property of being a covariant tensor field (linear over functions).

    Shown in the video
Conclusion

A covariant 2-tensor field is linear over the ring of smooth functions, allowing coefficient functions to be factored out.

Why the metric is symmetric

Clear evidence
Shown in the video
Evidence
  1. Audio
    Observation

    The lecturer says that because g restricted to each p is an inner product on the tangent space, for two vectors x and y one has g(x,y)=g(y,x)g(x,y)=g(y,x), so it is symmetric.

  2. Formula
    Observation

    The board separately states that g is a symmetric 2-tensor field.

Uncertainties
  1. The spoken formula uses g(x,y)g(x,y) without the subscript p, while the board's formal definition uses gpg_p on T_pM; the intended pointwise reading is clear from context.

Intuitive argument
Steps
  1. Expression
    gp is an inner product on TpMg_p \text{ is an inner product on } T_pM
    Explanation

    Start from the defining property that the value of the metric at each point is an inner product on the tangent space.

    Justification

    Stated directly on the board in the definition of a Riemannian metric.

    Shown in the video
  2. Expression
    g(x,y)=g(y,x)g(x,y)=g(y,x)
    Explanation

    Because an inner product is symmetric, the lecturer writes the symmetry relation for two vectors x and y.

    Justification

    Spoken explanation in the audio.

    Shown in the video
  3. Expression
    g is a symmetric 2-tensor fieldg \text{ is a symmetric 2-tensor field}
    Explanation

    Therefore the tensor field g is symmetric.

    Justification

    Conclusion stated both verbally and on the board.

    Shown in the video
Conclusion

The symmetry of g follows from the fact that each gpg_p is an inner product on T_pM.

Pointwise positive definiteness of the metric

Clear evidence
Shown in the video
Evidence
  1. Formula
    Observation

    The board writes "positive definite in the sense that gp(v,v)≥0g_p(v,v) \ge 0, gp(v,v)=0⇔v=0g_p(v,v)=0 \Leftrightarrow v=0".

  2. Audio
    Observation

    The lecturer says it is also positive definite because at each point gp(v,v)g_p(v,v) is nonnegative and equals zero if and only if the vector itself is zero.

Intuitive argument
Steps
  1. Expression
    gp(v,v)≥0g_p(v,v) \ge 0
    Explanation

    At each point p, evaluating the metric on a tangent vector against itself gives a nonnegative number.

    Justification

    Written on the board and repeated in the audio.

    Shown in the video
  2. Expression
    gp(v,v)=0⇔v=0g_p(v,v)=0 \Leftrightarrow v=0
    Explanation

    The quadratic expression vanishes exactly for the zero tangent vector.

    Justification

    Written on the board and explained verbally.

    Shown in the video
Conclusion

These two conditions express that gpg_p is positive definite on T_pM.

Beginning of the existence proof via partitions of unity

Approximate timing
Shown in the video
Evidence
  1. Formula
    Observation

    The lower page shows "Rmk: Use a partition of unity.", then an atlas A\mathcal{A}, a subordinate partition of unity \{This formula needs review. Please report it using the page feedback control.alpha\}, and "Now denote This formula needs review. Please report it using the page feedback control.alpha = ∑i\sum_i du_\alpha^i⊗i \otimes du_\alpha^i".

  2. Audio
    Observation

    The lecturer says the next part will study existence of Riemannian metrics.

Uncertainties
  1. The clip ends before the construction using This formula needs review. Please report it using the page feedback control.alpha and This formula needs review. Please report it using the page feedback control.alpha is carried out to define a global metric.

  2. The final assembly step of the proof is not visible in this segment.

Proof
Steps
  1. Expression
    Use a partition of unity.\text{Use a partition of unity.}
    Explanation

    The proof strategy is announced as using a partition of unity.

    Justification

    Written on the board under the proposition heading.

    Shown in the video
  2. Expression
    A={Fα:Uα→Qα⊆Rn}\mathcal{A}=\{F_\alpha: U_\alpha \to Q_\alpha \subseteq \mathbb{R}^n\}
    Explanation

    Choose an atlas of the manifold M.

    Justification

    Written on the lower page.

    Shown in the video
  3. Expression
    {ρα:Uα→[0,1]}\{\rho_\alpha: U_\alpha \to [0,1]\}
    Explanation

    Take a partition of unity subordinate to that atlas.

    Justification

    Written on the lower page.

    Shown in the video
  4. Expression
    δα=∑iduαi⊗duαi\delta_\alpha = \sum_i du_\alpha^i \otimes du_\alpha^i
    Explanation

    On each chart, define a local covariant 2-tensor from the coordinate differentials.

    Justification

    Written on the lower page.

    Shown in the video
Conclusion

The clip shows only the initial setup of the standard partition-of-unity proof that every smooth manifold admits a Riemannian metric; the remaining construction is outside this segment.

Worked examples · 1

Example of Vector Field Scaling

Clear evidence
Shown in the video
Evidence
  1. Audio
    Observation

    The speaker gives an example of multiplying a vector field by a function.

  2. Formula
    Observation

    The speaker writes 'fX'.

Problem

Illustrate how a vector field can be multiplied by a smooth function.

Given
  1. X is a vector field

  2. f is a smooth function

Goal

Show the result of f times X.

Steps
  1. Expression
    fXfX
    Explanation

    Multiply the vector field X by the smooth function f.

    Justification

    Definition of module structure over smooth functions.

    Shown in the video
Answer

fX is another vector field.

Verification

This is a standard construction in differential geometry where vector fields form a module over the ring of smooth functions.

Visual events · 8

Review of Previous Concepts via Scrolling

Clear evidence
Shown in the video
Evidence
  1. Animation
    Observation

    The digital whiteboard scrolls through previous notes covering inner products, norms, polarization identity, orthogonal complement, orthonormal basis, and Gram-Schmidt algorithm.

Objects
  1. Digital whiteboard notes

Changes
  1. Scrolling down through sections 2.1 Definitions

Invariants
  1. Handwritten text format

Interpretation

Visual recap of prerequisite linear algebra concepts before introducing the new definition.

Writing Mathematical Conditions

Clear evidence
Shown in the video
Evidence
  1. Animation
    Observation

    The speaker writes the equations for inner product preservation and vector space isomorphism properties next to the definition.

Objects
  1. Equations

  2. Purple ink

Changes
  1. Appearance of ⟨a\langle a, b⟩V=⟨F(a)b \rangle_V = \langle F(a), F(b)⟩WF(b) \rangle_W

  2. Appearance of F(a+b)=F(a)+F(b)F(a+b) = F(a) + F(b) and F(ka) = kF(a)

Invariants
  1. Definition text remains visible

Interpretation

Explicitly breaking down the verbal definition into formal mathematical equations.

Scrolling to Riemannian Metric Definition

Clear evidence
Shown in the video
Evidence
  1. Animation
    Observation

    The digital whiteboard scrolls down to reveal the definition of a Riemannian metric.

Objects
  1. Digital whiteboard

  2. Handwritten text

Changes
  1. The view scrolls downwards.

Invariants
  1. The content of the whiteboard remains the same.

Interpretation

The scrolling action transitions the focus from the previous topic of linear isometry to the new topic of Riemannian metrics.

Highlighting Key Terms

Clear evidence
Shown in the video
Evidence
  1. Animation
    Observation

    The speaker uses a purple pen to circle or underline key terms in the definition, such as 'inner product', 'smooth manifold', 'Riemannian metric g', 'smooth covariant 2-tensor field', and 'tensor'.

Objects
  1. Handwritten text

  2. Purple pen strokes

Changes
  1. Specific words and phrases are circled or underlined.

Invariants
  1. The underlying text remains unchanged.

Interpretation

The highlighting emphasizes the crucial components of the definitions being discussed.

Writing and Highlighting Definition

Clear evidence
Shown in the video
Evidence
  1. Animation
    Observation

    The video shows a digital whiteboard where the definition of a Riemannian metric is written and highlighted.

Objects
  1. Handwritten text

  2. Digital pen

Changes
  1. The speaker writes additional symbols like C∞(M)C^\infty(M), g, X, f, h, Y, and TM.

  2. The speaker underlines and circles parts of the pre-written definition.

Invariants
  1. The core definition text remains on screen.

Interpretation

The visual progression follows the speaker's verbal explanation, breaking down the formal definition into its constituent parts and properties.

Highlighting the pointwise metric and tangent space

Clear evidence
Shown in the video
Evidence
  1. Animation
    Observation

    A purple circle is drawn around gpg_p and then around T_pM on the definition line.

  2. Audio
    Observation

    During this interval the lecturer is explaining that the restriction to each p is an inner product on the tangent space.

Objects
  1. gpg_p

  2. T_pM

  3. purple annotation circle

Changes
  1. First gpg_p is circled.

  2. Then T_pM is circled.

Invariants
  1. The underlying definition text remains unchanged.

  2. The highlighted relation is that gpg_p lives on T_pM.

Interpretation

The visual emphasis matches the verbal point that the metric is defined pointwise: at each p, gpg_p is an inner product on the tangent space T_pM.

Underlining positive definiteness

Clear evidence
Shown in the video
Evidence
  1. Animation
    Observation

    A purple underline is drawn beneath "positive definite" and then beneath the inequality line involving gp(v,v)g_p(v,v).

  2. Audio
    Observation

    The lecturer says the metric is also positive definite and explains the nonnegativity and zero-equivalence condition.

Objects
  1. the phrase "positive definite"

  2. the formula gp(v,v)≥0g_p(v,v) \ge 0, gp(v,v)=0⇔v=0g_p(v,v)=0 \Leftrightarrow v=0

  3. purple underline

Changes
  1. The phrase "positive definite" is underlined first.

  2. The displayed inequalities are underlined next.

Invariants
  1. The definition text itself does not change.

  2. The focus stays on the pointwise quadratic form gp(v,v)g_p(v,v).

Interpretation

The annotation directs attention to the exact algebraic meaning of positive definiteness in the definition.

Scroll from definition to existence proposition

Clear evidence
Shown in the video
Evidence
  1. Animation
    Observation

    The page scrolls downward from the definition block to the proposition heading and then further to the proof setup lines.

  2. Formula
    Observation

    Newly revealed text includes "[Prop, Existence of Riemannian metric]", "Every smooth manifold admits a Riemannian metric.", "Rmk: Use a partition of unity.", the atlas definition, and This formula needs review. Please report it using the page feedback control.alpha = ∑i\sum_i du_\alpha^i⊗i \otimes du_\alpha^i.

Objects
  1. definition paragraph

  2. proposition heading

  3. proof setup lines

Changes
  1. The view moves from the definition of Riemannian manifold to the proposition statement.

  2. It then reveals the first lines of the proof using an atlas and partition of unity.

Invariants
  1. The previously written definition remains the same above.

  2. The mathematical topic stays on Riemannian metrics.

Interpretation

The scroll marks the transition from defining the central object to stating and beginning the proof of its existence on arbitrary smooth manifolds.

Misconceptions · 3

Confusing Tangent Spaces and Tensor Fields

Clear evidence
Shown in the video
Evidence
  1. Audio
    Observation

    The speaker corrects himself from saying 'tensor field' to 'tangent spaces'.

Misconception

Thinking that the vectors v and w mentioned in the definition belong to a tensor field directly.

Clarification

The vectors v and w belong to the tangent space T_pM at a specific point p. The metric g itself is the tensor field that assigns an inner product to these tangent spaces.

A Riemannian metric is not just a single scalar function

Clear evidence
Derived from the video
Evidence
  1. Formula
    Observation

    The board defines g as a smooth covariant 2-tensor field whose value at each p is an inner product on T_pM.

  2. Audio
    Observation

    The lecturer emphasizes the pointwise restriction to each p.

Misconception

One might think of a metric as a single numerical function on the manifold rather than a tensor field varying from point to point.

Clarification

The clip defines g as a smooth covariant 2-tensor field, and the key point is that at each point p the value gpg_p is an inner product on the tangent space T_pM.

Positive definite means more than merely nonnegative

Clear evidence
Shown in the video
Evidence
  1. Formula
    Observation

    The board writes "gp(v,v)≥0g_p(v,v) \ge 0, gp(v,v)=0⇔v=0g_p(v,v)=0 \Leftrightarrow v=0".

  2. Audio
    Observation

    The lecturer explicitly says the equality to zero holds if and only if the vector itself is zero.

Misconception

One may confuse positive semidefiniteness with positive definiteness.

Clarification

In this definition, gp(v,v)g_p(v,v) is not only nonnegative; it vanishes exactly when v=0v=0, which is the extra condition that makes the form positive definite.

Concept relations · 7

Definition of Linear Isometry → Definition of Linear Isometry

Clear evidence
Shown in the video
Evidence
  1. Audio
    Observation

    Speaker mentions generalizing this notion to abstract manifolds using tangent spaces and differential mappings to study Riemannian metrics.

  2. Formula
    Observation

    Section 2.2 Riemannian Metrics is visible on the board.

Application
Explanation

The concept of linear isometry between inner product spaces is generalized to define isometries between manifolds via their tangent spaces, which is essential for studying Riemannian metrics.

Linear Isometry → Riemannian Metric

Clear evidence
Shown in the video
Evidence
  1. Audio
    Observation

    The speaker states, "We extend the above geometric notions to abstract smooth manifolds -> a smooth varying choice of inner product on each tangent space."

Generalizes
Explanation

The concept of a Riemannian metric generalizes the idea of preserving inner products (as in a linear isometry) to smooth manifolds by assigning an inner product to each tangent space.

Definition of Riemannian Metric → Linearity Property of Tensor Fields

Clear evidence
Shown in the video
Evidence
  1. Formula
    Observation

    The definition states 'A Riemannian metric g ... is a smooth covariant 2-tensor field'.

Contains
Explanation

The definition of a Riemannian metric contains the concept of it being a tensor field, which implies the linearity property discussed.

Definition of Riemannian Metric → Definition of Tangent Bundle

Clear evidence
Shown in the video
Evidence
  1. Formula
    Observation

    The speaker defines TM using the tangent spaces T_pM which are part of the manifold M.

Application
Explanation

The concept of a Riemannian metric applies to the tangent bundle, as it defines an inner product on each fiber (tangent space) of the bundle.

Definition of a Riemannian metric → Definition of a Riemannian manifold

Clear evidence
Shown in the video
Evidence
  1. Formula
    Observation

    The board first defines a Riemannian metric g and then writes "Endowed with a Riemannian metric, (M,g) is called a Riemannian manifold."

Prerequisite
Explanation

The notion of a Riemannian manifold is built directly from the prior definition of a Riemannian metric on M.

Definition of a Riemannian metric → Existence proposition and proof setup

Clear evidence
Shown in the video
Evidence
  1. Formula
    Observation

    After defining the metric and the manifold, the board introduces "[Prop, Existence of Riemannian metric]" and the statement that every smooth manifold admits one.

  2. Audio
    Observation

    The lecturer says the next part will study existence of Riemannian metrics.

Application
Explanation

The existence proposition applies the just-defined notion of Riemannian metric to all smooth manifolds.

Definition of a Riemannian metric → Why the metric is symmetric

Clear evidence
Shown in the video
Evidence
  1. Audio
    Observation

    The lecturer derives symmetry of g from the fact that its restriction to each p is an inner product.

Proof dependency
Explanation

The derivation of symmetry depends on the defining requirement that gpg_p is an inner product on T_pM.

Find an answer · 12

What is the definition of a linear isometry between two inner product spaces?

Clear evidence
Shown in the video
Evidence
  1. Audio
    Observation

    Speaker defines linear isometry.

Knowledge points
  1. Definition of Linear Isometry

What are the algebraic conditions for a map to be a vector space isomorphism?

Clear evidence
Shown in the video
Evidence
  1. Formula
    Observation

    Equations for vector space isomorphism are written.

Knowledge points
  1. Conditions for Vector Space Isomorphism

What is the formal definition of a Riemannian metric on a smooth manifold?

Clear evidence
Shown in the video
Evidence
  1. Formula
    Observation

    The definition of a Riemannian metric is written on the board.

Knowledge points
  1. Riemannian Metric

What does it mean for a tensor field to be covariant?

Clear evidence
Shown in the video
Evidence
  1. Audio
    Observation

    The speaker explains, "covariant simply means it is a function of vectors. So you input some vectors and output is a number."

Knowledge points
  1. Riemannian Metric

What is the formal definition of a Riemannian metric on a smooth manifold?

Clear evidence
Shown in the video
Evidence
  1. Formula
    Observation

    The full definition is visible on screen.

Knowledge points
  1. Definition of Riemannian Metric
  2. Positive Definiteness of Riemannian Metric
  3. Symmetry of Riemannian Metric

How does a covariant tensor field behave when its vector arguments are scaled by smooth functions?

Clear evidence
Shown in the video
Evidence
  1. Formula
    Observation

    The equation g(fX, hY) = fh g(X,Y)g(X,Y) is written.

Knowledge points
  1. Linearity Property of Tensor Fields
  2. Derivation of Tensor Field Linearity

How is the tangent bundle of a manifold defined set-theoretically?

Clear evidence
Shown in the video
Evidence
  1. Formula
    Observation

    The equation TM = ⨆p∈MT\bigsqcup_{p \in M} T_pM is written.

Knowledge points
  1. Definition of Tangent Bundle

What is the precise definition of a Riemannian metric on a smooth manifold?

Clear evidence
Shown in the video
Evidence
  1. Formula
    Observation

    The full definition of a Riemannian metric is written on the board.

Knowledge points
  1. Definition of a Riemannian metric

Why is a Riemannian metric described as a symmetric 2-tensor field?

Clear evidence
Shown in the video
Evidence
  1. Audio
    Observation

    The lecturer explains symmetry via g(x,y)=g(y,x)g(x,y)=g(y,x) because each gpg_p is an inner product.

Knowledge points
  1. Definition of a Riemannian metric
  2. Why the metric is symmetric

What does positive definite mean for gp(v,v)g_p(v,v) in the definition of a Riemannian metric?

Clear evidence
Shown in the video
Evidence
  1. Formula
    Observation

    The board displays gp(v,v)≥0g_p(v,v) \ge 0 and gp(v,v)=0⇔v=0g_p(v,v)=0 \Leftrightarrow v=0.

Knowledge points
  1. Definition of a Riemannian metric
  2. Pointwise positive definiteness of the metric

When is a pair (M,g) called a Riemannian manifold?

Clear evidence
Shown in the video
Evidence
  1. Formula
    Observation

    The board states that (M,g) endowed with a Riemannian metric is called a Riemannian manifold.

Knowledge points
  1. Definition of a Riemannian manifold

How does the proof that every smooth manifold admits a Riemannian metric begin?

Approximate timing
Shown in the video
Evidence
  1. Formula
    Observation

    The lower page shows the proposition and the first lines of the proof using a partition of unity and This formula needs review. Please report it using the page feedback control.alpha.

Uncertainties
  1. Only the opening of the proof is present in this clip.

Knowledge points
  1. Existence proposition and proof setup
  2. Existence of Riemannian metrics on smooth manifolds
  3. Beginning of the existence proof via partitions of unity
Coverage and review notes

Covered · Review of previous concepts (inner products, norms, etc.) via scrolling notes; no new mathematical definitions introduced in this interval.

Covered · Definition and breakdown of linear isometry, including inner product preservation and vector space isomorphism conditions.

Covered · Definition of linear isometry.

Covered · Transition and scrolling to the next section.

Covered · Definition and explanation of Riemannian metrics.

Covered · The entire clip covers the definition of a Riemannian metric, its properties as a tensor field, the meaning of smoothness, and the related concept of the tangent bundle.

Covered · The board definition of a Riemannian metric is read and explained, including symmetry and pointwise positive definiteness.

Covered · The lecturer states that a smooth manifold endowed with a Riemannian metric is called a Riemannian manifold.

Covered · The page scrolls to the existence proposition and the first lines of its proof using an atlas, a subordinate partition of unity, and local tensors This formula needs review. Please report it using the page feedback control.alpha.

Explore the knowledge in this video

Open video knowledge graph →

  • Riemannian metrics ExplanationAt 2:22
    Why this connection?

    Reviewed English material v1: card "Riemannian Metric" at 2:22 — On a smooth manifold MM, a Riemannian metric gg is a smooth covariant 2-tensor field. At each point p∈Mp \in M, gpg_p is an inner product on the tangent space TpMT_pM. It is symmetric and positive definite: gp(v,v)≥0g_p(v,v) \ge 0 and gp(v,v)=0  ⟺  v=0g_p(v,v) = 0 \iff v = 0.