Skip to content
Back to exploration
Calculus / English

Comparison Test for Improper Integrals

Dr. Trefor Bazett · YouTube · 7:54

Open original
READ & KEEP

The explanation, unpacked.

Reviewed learning material · Video analysis · English
Read the full overview

The comparison test can decide whether an improper integral converges without finding its antiderivative. The lesson uses nonnegative bounds and p-integrals, then checks a rational-function example while respecting the direction of the test.

Use the learning inspector for key ideas and moments, or open the reading tabs for the complete notes.

Chapters

3:03Use the correct comparison direction4:18Compare with a p-integral5:16Check positivity on the example's tail7:14Know what the test does not say

Learning script

Generated from the video's visuals and explanation; not verbatim speech.

For 0≤g(x)≤f(x)0\le g(x)\le f(x) on the tail, with finite-interval integrability, convergence of ∫a∞f(x) dx\int_a^\infty f(x)\,dx forces convergence of the smaller integral. Divergence of the smaller integral forces divergence of the larger one.

For the stated benchmark with p>0p>0, ∫1∞x−p dx\int_1^\infty x^{-p}\,dx converges when p>1p>1 and diverges when 0<p≤10<p\le1. The case p=2p=2 provides a convenient convergent upper bound.

For x≥2x\ge2, 0≤x−2x3+1≤1x20\le\frac{x-2}{x^3+1}\le\frac1{x^2}. The comparison proves convergence on [2,∞)[2,\infty). On [1,2][1,2] the integrand is continuous, so that finite piece is well-defined; combining both pieces proves convergence from 1.

Comparison decides convergence or divergence, not the exact integral value. A convergent smaller function does not by itself prove a larger one converges, and a divergent larger function does not by itself prove a smaller one diverges.

Knowledge cards

01

Use the correct comparison direction

For 0≤g(x)≤f(x)0\le g(x)\le f(x) on the tail, with finite-interval integrability, convergence of ∫a∞f(x) dx\int_a^\infty f(x)\,dx forces convergence of the smaller integral. Divergence of the smaller integral forces divergence of the larger one.

02

Compare with a p-integral

For the stated benchmark with p>0p>0, ∫1∞x−p dx\int_1^\infty x^{-p}\,dx converges when p>1p>1 and diverges when 0<p≤10<p\le1. The case p=2p=2 provides a convenient convergent upper bound.

03

Check positivity on the example's tail

For x≥2x\ge2, 0≤x−2x3+1≤1x20\le\frac{x-2}{x^3+1}\le\frac1{x^2}. The comparison proves convergence on [2,∞)[2,\infty). On [1,2][1,2] the integrand is continuous, so that finite piece is well-defined; combining both pieces proves convergence from 1.

04

Know what the test does not say

Comparison decides convergence or divergence, not the exact integral value. A convergent smaller function does not by itself prove a larger one converges, and a divergent larger function does not by itself prove a smaller one diverges.

Explore the knowledge in this video

Open video knowledge graph →

  • Improper integrals ExplanationAt 3:03
    Why this connection?

    For 0≤g(x)≤f(x)0\le g(x)\le f(x) on the tail, with finite-interval integrability, convergence of ∫a∞f(x) dx\int_a^\infty f(x)\,dx forces convergence of the smaller integral. Divergence of the smaller integral forces divergence of the larger one. For the stated benchmark with p>0p>0, ∫1∞x−p dx\int_1^\infty x^{-p}\,dx converges when p>1p>1 and diverges when 0<p≤10<p\le1. The case p=2p=2 provides a convenient convergent upper bound. For x≥2x\ge2, 0≤x−2x3+1≤1x20\le\frac{x-2}{x^3+1}\le\frac1{x^2}. The comparison proves convergence on [2,∞)[2,\infty). On [1,2][1,2] the integrand is continuous, so that finite piece is well-defined; combining both pieces proves convergence from 1. Comparison decides convergence or divergence, not the exact integral value. A convergent smaller function does not by itself prove a larger one converges, and a divergent larger function does not by itself prove a smaller one diverges.

Questions this video answers

Meet the concept

↗
Know when to use it

↗
Find a method

↗
Find a method

↗