Use the correct comparison direction
For on the tail, with finite-interval integrability, convergence of forces convergence of the smaller integral. Divergence of the smaller integral forces divergence of the larger one.
Dr. Trefor Bazett · YouTube · 7:54
The comparison test can decide whether an improper integral converges without finding its antiderivative. The lesson uses nonnegative bounds and p-integrals, then checks a rational-function example while respecting the direction of the test.
Use the learning inspector for key ideas and moments, or open the reading tabs for the complete notes.
Generated from the video's visuals and explanation; not verbatim speech.
For on the tail, with finite-interval integrability, convergence of forces convergence of the smaller integral. Divergence of the smaller integral forces divergence of the larger one.
For the stated benchmark with , converges when and diverges when . The case provides a convenient convergent upper bound.
For , . The comparison proves convergence on . On the integrand is continuous, so that finite piece is well-defined; combining both pieces proves convergence from 1.
Comparison decides convergence or divergence, not the exact integral value. A convergent smaller function does not by itself prove a larger one converges, and a divergent larger function does not by itself prove a smaller one diverges.
For on the tail, with finite-interval integrability, convergence of forces convergence of the smaller integral. Divergence of the smaller integral forces divergence of the larger one.
For the stated benchmark with , converges when and diverges when . The case provides a convenient convergent upper bound.
For , . The comparison proves convergence on . On the integrand is continuous, so that finite piece is well-defined; combining both pieces proves convergence from 1.
Comparison decides convergence or divergence, not the exact integral value. A convergent smaller function does not by itself prove a larger one converges, and a divergent larger function does not by itself prove a smaller one diverges.
For on the tail, with finite-interval integrability, convergence of forces convergence of the smaller integral. Divergence of the smaller integral forces divergence of the larger one. For the stated benchmark with , converges when and diverges when . The case provides a convenient convergent upper bound. For , . The comparison proves convergence on . On the integrand is continuous, so that finite piece is well-defined; combining both pieces proves convergence from 1. Comparison decides convergence or divergence, not the exact integral value. A convergent smaller function does not by itself prove a larger one converges, and a divergent larger function does not by itself prove a smaller one diverges.
The comparison test decides convergence or divergence, but it does not determine the exact integral value. Additionally, it cannot prove convergence of a larger function based on a convergent smaller function, nor can it prove divergence of a smaller function based on a divergent larger function.
Conditions: The comparison test is applied to improper integrals.; The functions involved are nonnegative on the tail.
For the benchmark p-integral with , converges when and diverges when . The case provides a convenient convergent upper bound for comparison tests.
Conditions: The exponent is a positive real number ().; The integral is evaluated from to .
The comparison test decides convergence or divergence by bounding the target integrand with a simpler nonnegative function. If on the tail, convergence of the larger integral forces convergence of the smaller integral .
Conditions: The functions and are nonnegative on the tail interval .; The inequality holds for all .; Finite-interval integrability is assumed for the functions involved.
To prove convergence, split the integral into and . On , the integrand is continuous, so the finite piece is well-defined.
Conditions: The integral is .; The comparison function is .; The inequality holds for .