Skip to content
Back to exploration
Mathematical modeling / English

1 6 solving linear equations with rational fraction example

Rob Englot · YouTube · 8:58

Open original
READ & KEEP

The explanation, unpacked.

Saves 0

Reviewed learning material · Video analysis · English
Read the full overview

This 150-second clip introduces a lesson on solving linear equations with rational coefficients. The presenter writes the section title, explains that rational coefficients may appear as fractions, decimals, or related forms, and then sets up a fraction example with two equations: a) 12x−23y=73\frac{1}{2}x-\frac{2}{3}y=\frac{7}{3} and b) 34x+15y=1110\frac{3}{4}x+\frac{1}{5}y=\frac{11}{10}. The clip ends during the setup stage, with the stated method of finding a common denominator and multiplying through, but no solution is carried out. This video demonstrates the algebraic method for solving a system of linear equations with rational coefficients. The instructor explains and shows how to find a common denominator for each equation, multiply every term by that denominator to eliminate the fractions, and then reduce the resulting expressions to obtain a simpler system with integer coefficients. A brief correction highlights the importance of watching for sign errors during the multiplication step. The final transformed system is prepared for solving via substitution or elimination. This 150-second whiteboard lesson solves a two-equation linear system that began with rational coefficients. The page already shows the original equations 1/2x−2/3y=7/31/2 x - 2/3 y = 7/3 and 3/4x+1/5y=11/103/4 x + 1/5 y = 11/10, together with their cleared-denominator forms and the reduced integer system 3x−4y=143x - 4y = 14 and 15x+4y=2215x + 4y = 22. The instructor chooses elimination because the y-coefficients are opposites, adds the equations to get 18x=3618x = 36, and finds x=2x = 2. He then back-substitutes x=2x = 2 into the first original equation, simplifies 1−2/3y=7/31 - 2/3 y = 7/3, multiplies by 3 to clear denominators, and solves -2y = 4 to obtain y=−2y = -2. The ordered-pair solution (2, -2) is written, and a check in the second original equation is begun but not completed within the clip. This 88-second whiteboard clip is the verification stage of a handwritten algebra example titled Section 1.6 Solving Linear Equation with Rational #'s / Fraction Example. The earlier solution work is already on the page, and the instructor now checks the pair (2,−2)(2,-2) in the equation 34x+15y=1110\frac{3}{4}x+\frac{1}{5}y=\frac{11}{10}. He substitutes the values, multiplies to get 64\frac{6}{4} and −25-\frac{2}{5}, explains why a common denominator of 20 is needed, rewrites the terms as 3020\frac{30}{20} and 820\frac{8}{20} by multiplying by forms of 1, subtracts to obtain 2220\frac{22}{20}, reduces it to 1110\frac{11}{10}, and concludes the solution is correct. The last twenty seconds contain no new math, only a page adjustment and a preview of the next tutorial.

Use the learning inspector for key ideas and moments, or open the reading tabs for the complete notes.

Chapters

0:00Opening pause and setup0:01Topic introduction: linear equations with rational coefficients0:40Forms rational coefficients can take1:04Writing the fraction example equations1:52Plan for eliminating denominators2:30Introduction to the Method2:38Clearing Fractions in Equation A3:21Clearing Fractions in Equation B4:03Reducing the Equations4:35Correcting a Sign Error4:56Final Transformed System5:00Setup: rational system already reduced to integers5:15Elimination by adding the equations5:45Back-substitution to solve for y6:20Clearing denominators and finishing y=−2y = -27:08Solution pair and start of verification7:30Substitution setup for the check7:40Multiplying the fractional terms7:52Finding a common denominator8:16Subtracting and reducing to confirm the solution8:36Page adjustment and next-topic preview

Learning script

Generated from the video's visuals and explanation; not verbatim speech.

The clip opens on a blank sheet of graph paper, then the instructor begins speaking and writes the heading "Section 1.6 Solving linear equation with Rational #s" across the top.

With the title in place, the speaker explains that the lesson concerns linear equations whose coefficients are rational numbers, and he names several ways those coefficients can appear: fractions, decimals, bracketed expressions, fractions with binomial tops, and possibly roots.

He then narrows the focus to the first case, saying this tutorial will use a fraction example, and writes the subheading "Fraction Example" below the title.

Under that heading he writes the first equation, labeled a): 12x−23y=73\frac{1}{2}x-\frac{2}{3}y=\frac{7}{3}.

He immediately adds a second equation, labeled b): 34x+15y=1110\frac{3}{4}x+\frac{1}{5}y=\frac{11}{10}.

After both equations are on the page, the instructor states the first goal: decide how to eliminate the denominators. He emphasizes that each equation will be treated independently at this stage.

Turning to equation a), he points out the denominators 2 and 3 and says a common denominator must be found before clearing fractions.

He writes the procedural note "Find Common Denominator" and then "x Multiply through," setting up the next algebraic step.

The clip ends before he actually computes the common denominator or rewrites either equation without fractions.

The video begins by outlining the strategy for solving a system of linear equations that contain rational coefficients. The core method is to find a common denominator for each individual equation and multiply every term through by that value to eliminate the fractions.

Applying this to the first equation, the denominators are 2, 3, and 3. The least common multiple is 6. The instructor multiplies each term—(1/21/2)x, -(2/32/3)y, and 7/37/3—by 6. This results in the intermediate expression (6/26/2)x−(12/3)y=42/3x - (12/3)y = 42/3.

For the second equation, the denominators are 4, 5, and 10. The instructor notes that 10 is not a multiple of 4, so the least common multiple must be 20. Every term in the equation is multiplied by 20, yielding (60/460/4)x+(20/5)y=220/10x + (20/5)y = 220/10.

With the fractions cleared, the next step is to reduce the equations by performing the division in each term. For the first equation, 6 divided by 2 is 3, 12 divided by 3 is 4, and 42 divided by 3 is 14, simplifying the equation to 3x−4y=143x - 4y = 14.

Turning to the second equation, 60 divided by 4 gives 15x. The instructor briefly catches and corrects a sign error, ensuring the middle term remains positive. Twenty divided by 5 is 4, giving +4y, and 220 divided by 10 is 22. The simplified equation is 15x+4y=2215x + 4y = 22.

The original system with rational coefficients has now been successfully transformed into a system with integer coefficients: 3x−4y=143x - 4y = 14 and 15x+4y=2215x + 4y = 22. This new system is much easier to solve using standard methods like substitution or elimination.

The page opens with the full setup already visible: the title identifies Section 1.6 on solving linear equations with rational numbers, and two original fractional equations are shown above their cleared-denominator versions. Beneath them is the reduced integer system 3x−4y=143x-4y=14 and 15x+4y=2215x+4y=22. The instructor frames the next move as choosing the elimination method, because the system has already been prepared for it.

The key observation is that the coefficients of yy are opposites: −4y-4y in the first equation and +4y+4y in the second. That means the equations can be added directly, and the yy-terms will cancel. The instructor notes that this convenience is not guaranteed in every problem; sometimes extra manipulation is needed first, but here the setup is already ideal.

Adding the two equations term by term gives 18x=3618x=36, since 3x+15x=18x3x+15x=18x and 14+22=3614+22=36, while −4y+4y=0-4y+4y=0. Dividing by 1818 yields x=2x=2. This is the first completed unknown, and the rest of the solution will be built from it.

To find yy, the instructor switches from elimination to back-substitution. He explicitly uses one of the original equations rather than the reduced integer system, writing 12(2)−23y=73\frac12(2)-\frac23y=\frac73. Substituting x=2x=2 turns the two-variable problem into a one-variable equation in yy.

The product 12(2)\frac12(2) simplifies to 11, so the equation becomes 1−23y=731-\frac23y=\frac73. At this stage the remaining obstacle is the fractions. The instructor therefore applies the same strategy used earlier on the page: clear denominators by multiplying every term by a common denominator.

Because the denominators present are 11 and 33, the common denominator is 33. Multiplying through by 33 transforms 1−23y=731-\frac23y=\frac73 into 3−2y=73-2y=7. This step preserves equivalence while removing fractions, making the equation easier to isolate.

Now the equation is purely linear in yy. Subtracting 33 from both sides gives −2y=4-2y=4, and dividing by −2-2 gives y=−2y=-2. Together with the earlier result x=2x=2, the system’s solution is the ordered pair (2,−2)(2,-2).

The instructor then states the final procedural step: verification. Since yy was found by substituting into the first original equation, he checks the pair in the second original equation instead. He begins writing 34(2)+15(−2)\frac34(2)+\frac15(-2), signaling that the solution should satisfy the unused equation as well. The clip ends before that arithmetic check is completed.

The page is already filled with earlier work from a lesson on solving linear equations with rational coefficients. At this moment the instructor is not solving from scratch; he is checking a candidate solution by substituting y=−2y=-2 into the displayed equation and aiming to recover the right-hand side 1110\frac{11}{10}.

He evaluates the two products one at a time. The first term becomes 64\frac{6}{4}, and the second becomes −25-\frac{2}{5}. This is the ordinary rule for multiplying a fraction by an integer: keep the denominator and multiply the numerator.

Now the subtraction cannot be done directly because the denominators are different. The instructor therefore pauses the arithmetic to explain that a common denominator is required before combining 64\frac{6}{4} and 25\frac{2}{5}.

He chooses 20 as the common denominator and justifies the rewrite carefully: multiply the first fraction by 55\frac{5}{5} and the second by 44\frac{4}{4}. Since each of those factors equals 1, the values do not change; only the form of the fractions changes so they can be subtracted.

With the equivalent fractions 3020\frac{30}{20} and 820\frac{8}{20} in place, the subtraction is straightforward. The numerators combine to give 2220\frac{22}{20}, and then the fraction is reduced by canceling the common factor 2, yielding 1110\frac{11}{10}.

That final simplified value matches the right-hand side of the original equation, so the instructor states that the check is true and the solution is correct. The mathematical point of this segment is that verification succeeds when substitution and simplification produce an identity.

After the proof is complete, there is no further algebra. He slides the paper upward to keep the lower writing in view and closes by saying this was the first fraction example and that the next tutorial will use fractions with binomial tops.

Knowledge cards

01

Topic of the lesson

The video introduces a lesson on solving linear equations with rational coefficients, meaning the numbers multiplying the variables are rational numbers. The spoken introduction and the handwritten title both identify this as Section 1.6.

02

Rational coefficients can appear in several forms

The speaker says rational coefficients may show up as fractions, decimals, expressions with brackets, fractions with binomial tops, and even roots. Only the fraction case is actually written in this clip.

03

Fraction example setup

The presenter writes two example equations under the heading "Fraction Example": a) 12x−23y=73\frac{1}{2}x-\frac{2}{3}y=\frac{7}{3} and b) 34x+15y=1110\frac{3}{4}x+\frac{1}{5}y=\frac{11}{10}. These are the concrete problems used to begin the lesson.

a) 12x−23y=73;b) 34x+15y=1110a)\ \frac{1}{2}x-\frac{2}{3}y=\frac{7}{3};\quad b)\ \frac{3}{4}x+\frac{1}{5}y=\frac{11}{10}
04

First method step: clear denominators

For equations with fractional coefficients, the instructor states that the first goal is to eliminate the denominators. He writes the plan "Find Common Denominator" and then "x Multiply through."

05

Each equation is handled independently at this stage

When introducing the denominator-clearing step, the speaker explicitly says each equation is treated independently. In this clip, he begins with equation a) and its denominators 2 and 3.

06

Method for Clearing Fractions

To solve a linear system with rational coefficients, find a common denominator for each equation. Multiply every term in that equation by the common denominator to eliminate the fractions, then reduce the resulting integer-coefficient equation.

07

Finding the Least Common Multiple

When determining the common denominator for an equation with multiple fractions, find the least common multiple of all the denominators. For example, for denominators 4, 5, and 10, the LCM is 20, not 10, because 10 is not a multiple of 4.

08

Avoiding Sign Errors

When multiplying through an equation to clear fractions, carefully check the sign of each term. A common mistake is accidentally changing a plus sign to a minus sign or vice versa during the arithmetic.

09

Reducing Equations

After multiplying by the common denominator, simplify each fraction by dividing the numerator by the denominator. For instance, (6/26/2)x reduces to 3x, and (42/342/3) reduces to 14.

10

Elimination works directly when coefficients are opposites

In the reduced system 3x−4y=143x-4y=14 and 15x+4y=2215x+4y=22, the yy-coefficients are −4-4 and +4+4. Because they are exact opposites, adding the equations eliminates yy immediately. The instructor emphasizes that this direct setup is convenient but not universal; other systems may require prior manipulation.

3x−4y=14,15x+4y=223x-4y=14,\quad 15x+4y=22
11

Adding the system gives x=2x = 2

Term-by-term addition produces (3x+15x)+(−4y+4y)=14+22(3x+15x)+(-4y+4y)=14+22, hence 18x=3618x=36. Dividing by 1818 yields x=2x=2. This is the first solved variable and the basis for the next step.

18x=36 ⇒ x=218x=36\ \Rightarrow\ x=2
12

Back-substitute into an original equation to find y

After obtaining x=2x=2, the instructor substitutes into the first original fractional equation, 12x−23y=73\frac12x-\frac23y=\frac73, giving 12(2)−23y=73\frac12(2)-\frac23y=\frac73. This reduces the problem to one equation in one unknown.

12(2)−23y=73\frac{1}{2}(2)-\frac{2}{3}y=\frac{7}{3}
13

Clear denominators with the common denominator 3

The substituted equation simplifies to 1−23y=731-\frac23y=\frac73. To remove fractions, every term is multiplied by 33, the common denominator of 11 and 33. The equivalent equation becomes 3−2y=73-2y=7.

1−23y=73 ⇒ 3−2y=71-\frac{2}{3}y=\frac{7}{3}\ \Rightarrow\ 3-2y=7
14

Solve the resulting one-variable equation for y

From 3−2y=73-2y=7, subtract 33 from both sides to get −2y=4-2y=4, then divide by −2-2 to obtain y=−2y=-2. Combined with x=2x=2, the solution pair is (2,−2)(2,-2).

−2y=4 ⇒ y=−2-2y=4\ \Rightarrow\ y=-2
15

Verify the solution in the unused original equation

The instructor treats checking as the last step and begins substituting (2,−2)(2,-2) into the second original equation, 34x+15y=1110\frac34x+\frac15y=\frac{11}{10}. The visible start of the check is 34(2)+15(−2)\frac34(2)+\frac15(-2), though the clip ends before the verification is completed.

34(2)+15(−2)\frac{3}{4}(2)+\frac{1}{5}(-2)
16

Checking a solution by substitution

The clip’s main task is verification, not solving. The instructor takes the already-found values x=2x=2 and y=−2y=-2, inserts them into 34x+15y=1110\frac{3}{4}x+\frac{1}{5}y=\frac{11}{10}, and checks whether the two sides become the same number.

34(2)+15(−2)=1110\frac{3}{4}(2)+\frac{1}{5}(-2)=\frac{11}{10}
17

Multiplying a fraction by an integer

Each product is simplified separately before any addition or subtraction is attempted. Multiplying 34\frac{3}{4} by 2 gives 64\frac{6}{4}, and multiplying 15\frac{1}{5} by −2-2 gives −25-\frac{2}{5}.

34⋅2=64,15⋅(−2)=−25\frac{3}{4}\cdot 2=\frac{6}{4},\quad \frac{1}{5}\cdot(-2)=-\frac{2}{5}
18

Why a common denominator is needed

The instructor explicitly stops before subtracting because 64\frac{6}{4} and 25\frac{2}{5} do not share a denominator. A common denominator is required so the numerators can be combined directly.

19

Equivalent fractions by multiplying by 1

To reach denominator 20, he multiplies by 55\frac{5}{5} and 44\frac{4}{4}. The key idea stated aloud is that these factors equal 1, so the fractions change form but not value.

64⋅55=3020,25⋅44=820\frac{6}{4}\cdot\frac{5}{5}=\frac{30}{20},\quad \frac{2}{5}\cdot\frac{4}{4}=\frac{8}{20}
20

Subtracting same-denominator fractions

Once both terms are written over 20, the subtraction is performed on the numerators alone. This produces 2220\frac{22}{20}, which is then reduced to 1110\frac{11}{10}.

3020−820=2220=1110\frac{30}{20}-\frac{8}{20}=\frac{22}{20}=\frac{11}{10}
21

Conclusion of the verification

Because the simplified left-hand side equals the right-hand side, the instructor declares the check true and the solution correct. The final mathematical takeaway is that a valid solution must make the original equation a true statement.

Detailed learning notes

Explore conditions, steps and evidence. Supplementary explanations are labeled separately from content shown in the video.

Symbols · 26

x

Clear evidence
Shown in the video
Evidence
  1. Formula
    Observation

    Equation a) is written as "1/2x−2/3y=7/31/2 x - 2/3 y = 7/3", so x appears as the variable multiplied by 1/21/2.

  2. Formula
    Observation

    Equation b) is written as "3/4x+1/5y=11/103/4 x + 1/5 y = 11/10", so x appears again as the variable multiplied by 3/43/4.

Symbol

x

Meaning

Unknown variable appearing in both linear equations.

Domain

Video does not state a domain for x.

y

Clear evidence
Shown in the video
Evidence
  1. Formula
    Observation

    Equation a) contains "- 2/3y2/3 y".

  2. Formula
    Observation

    Equation b) contains "+ 1/5y1/5 y".

Symbol

y

Meaning

Second unknown variable appearing in both linear equations.

Domain

Video does not state a domain for y.

a)

Clear evidence
Shown in the video
Evidence
  1. Formula
    Observation

    The first equation is labeled "a)" on the page.

  2. Audio
    Observation

    Speaker says, "That's going to be equation A."

Symbol

a)

Meaning

Label identifying the first displayed equation.

Domain

Label only; not a mathematical variable.

b)

Clear evidence
Shown in the video
Evidence
  1. Formula
    Observation

    The second equation is labeled "b)" on the page.

  2. Audio
    Observation

    Speaker says, "and then B will be ..."

Symbol

b)

Meaning

Label identifying the second displayed equation.

Domain

Label only; not a mathematical variable.

x

Clear evidence
Shown in the video
Evidence
  1. Formula
    Observation

    x appears in equation a) as the variable multiplied by 1/21/2 and later by 6/26/2.

Symbol

x

Meaning

unknown variable in the first equation of the system

Domain

real number (assumed from context)

y

Clear evidence
Shown in the video
Evidence
  1. Formula
    Observation

    y appears in equation a) as the variable multiplied by -2/3 and later by -12/3.

Symbol

y

Meaning

unknown variable in the first equation of the system

Domain

real number (assumed from context)

x

Clear evidence
Shown in the video
Evidence
  1. Formula
    Observation

    x appears in equation b) as the variable multiplied by 3/43/4 and later by 60/460/4.

Symbol

x

Meaning

unknown variable in the second equation of the system

Domain

real number (assumed from context)

y

Clear evidence
Shown in the video
Evidence
  1. Formula
    Observation

    y appears in equation b) as the variable multiplied by 1/51/5 and later by 20/520/5.

Symbol

y

Meaning

unknown variable in the second equation of the system

Domain

real number (assumed from context)

x

Clear evidence
Shown in the video
Evidence
  1. Formula
    Observation

    x appears in the system 3x−4y=143x - 4y = 14 and 15x+4y=2215x + 4y = 22, then in the substitution step 1/2(2)−2/3y=7/31/2(2) - 2/3 y = 7/3.

Symbol

x

Meaning

unknown variable in the two-variable linear system; solved value is x=2x=2.

Domain

real numbers

y

Clear evidence
Shown in the video
Evidence
  1. Formula
    Observation

    y appears in 3x−4y=143x - 4y = 14, 15x+4y=2215x + 4y = 22, and later in 1/2(2)−2/3y=7/31/2(2) - 2/3 y = 7/3 and -2y = 4.

Symbol

y

Meaning

unknown variable in the two-variable linear system; solved value is y=−2y=-2.

Domain

real numbers

3x−4y=143x - 4y = 14

Clear evidence
Shown in the video
Evidence
  1. Formula
    Observation

    The page shows the reduced integer system 3x−4y=143x - 4y = 14 and 15x+4y=2215x + 4y = 22 under 'Reduce the equations'.

Symbol

3x−4y=143x - 4y = 14

Meaning

first reduced equation obtained from the original fractional equation a).

Domain

linear equation in two variables

15x+4y=2215x + 4y = 22

Clear evidence
Shown in the video
Evidence
  1. Formula
    Observation

    The page shows the reduced integer system 3x−4y=143x - 4y = 14 and 15x+4y=2215x + 4y = 22 under 'Reduce the equations'.

Symbol

15x+4y=2215x + 4y = 22

Meaning

second reduced equation obtained from the original fractional equation b).

Domain

linear equation in two variables

Knowledge points · 16

Topic: solving linear equations with rational coefficients

Clear evidence
Shown in the video
Evidence
  1. Audio
    Observation

    Speaker says the tutorial deals with "solving equations, linear equations that have rational coefficients or rational numbers in them."

  2. Formula
    Observation

    Handwritten title reads "Section 1.6 Solving linear equation with Rational #s".

Definition
Explanation

This clip introduces a lesson on solving linear equations whose coefficients are rational numbers. The speaker explicitly frames the section as working with rational coefficients, and the written heading states the same topic.

Formula
Conditions
  1. The equations under discussion are linear.

  2. The coefficients are rational numbers.

Rational-number forms mentioned for coefficients

Clear evidence
Shown in the video
Evidence
  1. Audio
    Observation

    Speaker says, "So you could have fractions, decimals, and other types, maybe even roots and stuff like that."

  2. Audio
    Observation

    Speaker then says the examples will look at fractions, brackets, fractions with binomial tops, and decimals.

Uncertainties
  1. The mention of roots is spoken as a possible type but no root example is shown in this clip.

Definition
Explanation

The speaker identifies several ways rational coefficients can appear in examples: fractions, decimals, expressions involving brackets, and fractions with binomial numerators. This is a verbal overview of the kinds of coefficient forms the section will address.

Formula
Conditions
  1. These are forms mentioned by the speaker, not all demonstrated within this clip.

Prerequisites
  1. Topic: solving linear equations with rational coefficients

Method: eliminate denominators by finding a common denominator and multiplying through

Clear evidence
Shown in the video
Evidence
  1. Audio
    Observation

    Speaker says the first goal is to decide how to eliminate the denominators in each equation.

  2. Audio
    Observation

    Speaker says, "We've got to find a common denominator so that we can eliminate the denominator there between two and three."

  3. Formula
    Observation

    Handwritten note begins "Find Common Denominator" and then "x Multiply through".

Uncertainties
  1. The clip stops before the multiplication step is carried out.

Method
Explanation

For an equation with fractional coefficients, the speaker’s stated first step is to find a common denominator and then multiply the whole equation through by it. In equation a), the denominators mentioned are 2 and 3, so the method is introduced before any algebraic simplification is performed.

Formula
Conditions
  1. Applies to equations containing fractional coefficients.

  2. Each equation is treated independently in the setup described here.

Prerequisites
  1. Topic: solving linear equations with rational coefficients

Method for clearing fractions in a linear system

Clear evidence
Shown in the video
Evidence
  1. Audio
    Observation

    The speaker explains to find the common denominator for each equation and multiply through in each expression.

  2. Formula
    Observation

    The written note says 'Find Common Denominator x Through'.

Method
Explanation

To solve a linear system with rational coefficients, first find a common denominator for the fractions in each equation. Then multiply every term in that equation by the common denominator to eliminate the fractions, and finally reduce the resulting integer-coefficient equation.

Formula
Conditions
  1. The system consists of linear equations with rational coefficients.

  2. Each equation is processed separately using its own common denominator.

Reducing equations after clearing fractions

Clear evidence
Shown in the video
Evidence
  1. Audio
    Observation

    The speaker states, 'Then we reduce the equation.'

  2. Formula
    Observation

    The written note says 'Reduce The equations'.

Method
Explanation

After multiplying through by the common denominator, simplify each fraction by dividing the numerator by the denominator to obtain an equivalent equation with integer coefficients.

Formula
Conditions
  1. Fractions have been cleared by multiplying every term by a common denominator.

Prerequisites
  1. Method for clearing fractions in a linear system

Elimination method for a prepared linear system

Clear evidence
Shown in the video
Evidence
  1. Audio
    Observation

    The instructor says elimination is the easiest method here because there is a negative 4y and a positive 4y, so one can just add the equations.

  2. Formula
    Observation

    The displayed system is 3x−4y=143x - 4y = 14 and 15x+4y=2215x + 4y = 22, whose y-coefficients are opposites.

Method
Explanation

When two linear equations in the same variables have opposite coefficients for one variable, adding the equations eliminates that variable directly. In this clip the y-terms are -4y and +4y, so addition removes y and leaves an equation only in x.

Formula
3x−4y=14,15x+4y=223x - 4y = 14,\quad 15x + 4y = 22
Conditions
  1. Two equations involve the same unknowns.

  2. One pair of corresponding coefficients are exact opposites.

  3. Equations are aligned term-by-term before addition.

Back-substitution into an original equation

Clear evidence
Shown in the video
Evidence
  1. Audio
    Observation

    After finding x=2x=2, the instructor says they would solve for y given that x=2x=2 and chooses one of the original equations.

  2. Formula
    Observation

    He writes 1/2(2)−2/3y=7/31/2(2) - 2/3 y = 7/3, then simplifies to 1−2/3y=7/31 - 2/3 y = 7/3.

Method
Explanation

Once one variable is found, substitute its value into one of the original equations and solve the resulting one-variable equation for the remaining unknown. Here x=2x=2 is substituted into the first original fractional equation rather than the reduced integer system.

Formula
12(2)−23y=73\frac{1}{2}(2)-\frac{2}{3}y=\frac{7}{3}
Conditions
  1. At least one variable has already been solved.

  2. The chosen equation still contains the remaining unknown.

  3. Substitution uses the original equation or any equivalent equation from the system.

Prerequisites
  1. Elimination method for a prepared linear system

Clearing denominators in a one-variable equation

Clear evidence
Shown in the video
Evidence
  1. Audio
    Observation

    The instructor says to eliminate the denominator by using a common denominator, which here is 3, and multiply everything by 3.

  2. Formula
    Observation

    From 1−2/3y=7/31 - 2/3 y = 7/3 he writes 3−2y=73 - 2y = 7.

Method
Explanation

If an equation contains fractions, multiply every term by a common denominator to obtain an equivalent equation without fractions. In this clip the denominators are 1 and 3, so multiplying by 3 converts 1−2/3y=7/31 - 2/3 y = 7/3 into 3−2y=73 - 2y = 7.

Formula
1−23y=73 ⇒ 3−2y=71-\frac{2}{3}y=\frac{7}{3}\ \Rightarrow\ 3-2y=7
Conditions
  1. All terms are multiplied by the same nonzero number.

  2. The multiplier is a common denominator of the fractional terms.

Prerequisites
  1. Back-substitution into an original equation

Checking a system solution in the unused equation

Clear evidence
Shown in the video
Evidence
  1. Audio
    Observation

    The instructor says the last step is to reassure ourselves by a check and will use the other equation.

  2. Formula
    Observation

    He begins writing 3/4(2)+1/5(−2)3/4(2) + 1/5(-2) ... for verification.

Uncertainties
  1. The clip ends before the verification arithmetic is completed on screen.

Method
Explanation

After obtaining an ordered pair, verify it by substituting into an equation not used for back-substitution. This confirms that the pair satisfies the whole system, not just one equation. Here the solution (2,-2) is checked in the second original equation.

Formula
34(2)+15(−2)=1110\frac{3}{4}(2)+\frac{1}{5}(-2)=\frac{11}{10}
Conditions
  1. A candidate ordered pair has been found.

  2. At least one original equation remains available for substitution checking.

Prerequisites
  1. Back-substitution into an original equation

Substituting a found solution back into an equation

Clear evidence
Shown in the video
Evidence
  1. Audio
    Observation

    The speaker says yy is negative two and that this will give eleven tenths.

  2. Formula
    Observation

    The page shows the verification setup 34(2)+15(−2)=1110\frac{3}{4}(2)+\frac{1}{5}(-2)=\frac{11}{10}.

Method
Explanation

The clip demonstrates checking a previously obtained solution by replacing the variables in the second equation with the values already found on the page, namely x=2x=2 and y=−2y=-2. The purpose is not to solve again but to verify that the ordered pair satisfies the equation.

Conditions
  1. The candidate solution values must already be known.

  2. The equation being checked must contain those variables.

Multiplying a fraction by an integer

Clear evidence
Shown in the video
Evidence
  1. Audio
    Observation

    He says using our fraction skills, this is six over four times one, which is four, and this would be negative two over five.

  2. Formula
    Observation

    The written intermediate terms are 64\frac{6}{4} and −25-\frac{2}{5}.

Method
Explanation

The instructor evaluates each product by multiplying the numerator by the integer while keeping the denominator unchanged: 34⋅2=64\frac{3}{4}\cdot 2=\frac{6}{4} and 15⋅(−2)=−25\frac{1}{5}\cdot(-2)=-\frac{2}{5}. This is the first arithmetic step after substitution.

Conditions
  1. The integer is treated as having denominator 1.

  2. Only the numerator changes when multiplying directly by the integer.

Using a common denominator to subtract fractions

Clear evidence
Shown in the video
Evidence
  1. Audio
    Observation

    He says we have to do a common denominator here to subtract these two, and the common denominator here would be twenty.

  2. Formula
    Observation

    He rewrites 64\frac{6}{4} and 25\frac{2}{5} with denominator 20.

Method
Explanation

Before subtracting 64\frac{6}{4} and 25\frac{2}{5}, the instructor converts both fractions to equivalent fractions with the same denominator, choosing 20. This makes the numerators directly comparable so the subtraction can be performed in one step.

Conditions
  1. The fractions must be rewritten as equivalent fractions.

  2. The chosen denominator must be a common multiple of the original denominators.

Claims and conditions · 5

Each equation is treated independently when eliminating denominators

Clear evidence
Shown in the video
Evidence
  1. Audio
    Observation

    Speaker says, "each of them are going to be treated independently."

Uncertainties
  1. The clip does not show whether the two equations are later combined into a system or solved separately.

Proposition
Statement

When clearing denominators in this example, each equation is handled independently rather than together.

Hypotheses
  1. There are multiple displayed equations.

  2. The current step is eliminating denominators.

Quantifiers

For each equation in the displayed set, the denominator-clearing step is applied separately.

Opposite coefficients allow direct elimination by addition

Clear evidence
Shown in the video
Evidence
  1. Audio
    Observation

    The instructor states that because there is a negative 4y and a positive 4y, one can just add the equations.

  2. Formula
    Observation

    Adding 3x−4y=143x - 4y = 14 and 15x+4y=2215x + 4y = 22 yields 18x=3618x = 36.

Proposition
Statement

If two linear equations contain opposite coefficients for the same variable, adding the equations eliminates that variable.

Hypotheses
  1. The equations are written in aligned form.

  2. The corresponding coefficients of one variable are negatives of each other.

Quantifiers

For a pair of linear equations in the same variables.

The worked system has solution (2,-2)

Clear evidence
Shown in the video
Evidence
  1. Formula
    Observation

    The page records 'Solution (2, -2)' after deriving x=2x=2 and y=−2y=-2.

  2. Audio
    Observation

    The instructor says, 'So our solution is equal to 2 negative 2.'

Proposition
Statement

The simultaneous solution of the displayed system is x=2x=2 and y=−2y=-2.

Hypotheses
  1. The system is 3x−4y=143x - 4y = 14 and 15x+4y=2215x + 4y = 22, equivalently derived from the original fractional equations.

Quantifiers

For the specific two-equation system shown in the clip.

The substituted pair satisfies the displayed equation

Clear evidence
Shown in the video
Evidence
  1. Formula
    Observation

    The page shows 34(2)+15(−2)=1110\frac{3}{4}(2)+\frac{1}{5}(-2)=\frac{11}{10} and the intermediate work leads to the same value.

  2. Audio
    Observation

    The speaker says this is going to give us eleven tenths and later says we are correct there.

Proposition
Statement

For the displayed equation 34x+15y=1110\frac{3}{4}x+\frac{1}{5}y=\frac{11}{10}, the values x=2x=2 and y=−2y=-2 make the equation true.

Hypotheses
  1. The equation being checked is 34x+15y=1110\frac{3}{4}x+\frac{1}{5}y=\frac{11}{10}.

  2. The candidate values are x=2x=2 and y=−2y=-2.

Quantifiers

For these specific values of xx and yy.

Multiplying a fraction by a form of 1 does not change its value

Clear evidence
Shown in the video
Evidence
  1. Audio
    Observation

    He says if you're multiplying by five over five, that's one, you're not changing the value, and you're not changing the value by multiplying by four over four.

Proposition
Statement

Multiplying a fraction by 55\frac{5}{5} or 44\frac{4}{4} leaves its value unchanged because each factor equals 1.

Hypotheses
  1. The factor used is a fraction with equal nonzero numerator and denominator.

Quantifiers

For the fractions shown in this worked example.

Derivations and proofs · 6

Setup for clearing denominators in equation a)

Clear evidence
Shown in the video
Evidence
  1. Formula
    Observation

    Equation a) is written as "1/2x−2/3y=7/31/2 x - 2/3 y = 7/3".

  2. Audio
    Observation

    Speaker identifies the denominators in equation a) as 2 and 3 and says a common denominator is needed.

  3. Formula
    Observation

    Written plan says "Find Common Denominator" and "x Multiply through".

Uncertainties
  1. The actual common denominator value is not written before the clip ends.

  2. No multiplied equation is shown.

Proof
Steps
  1. Expression
    12x−23y=73\frac{1}{2}x-\frac{2}{3}y=\frac{7}{3}
    Explanation

    The first displayed equation is written on the page.

    Justification

    Directly observed from the handwritten formula.

    Shown in the video
  2. Expression
    denominators: 2, 3, 3\text{denominators: }2,\ 3,\ 3
    Explanation

    The speaker points out the denominators involved in equation a).

    Justification

    Audio states the need to eliminate the denominator "between two and three," and the written equation also shows 7/37/3 on the right-hand side.

    Shown in the video
  3. Expression
    Find Common Denominator\text{Find Common Denominator}
    Explanation

    The chosen first step is to find a common denominator for the fractional terms.

    Justification

    Explicitly written on the page and stated in the audio.

    Shown in the video
  4. Expression
    × Multiply through\times \text{ Multiply through}
    Explanation

    After finding the common denominator, the next planned step is to multiply the entire equation through by it.

    Justification

    Explicitly written on the page and stated in the audio.

    Shown in the video
Conclusion

The clip establishes the method for equation a): identify the denominators, find a common denominator, and multiply through. The execution is not reached within this segment.

Derivation of the simplified first equation

Clear evidence
Shown in the video
Evidence
  1. Audio
    Observation

    The speaker identifies the common denominator for equation a) as 6 and multiplies through.

  2. Formula
    Observation

    The written steps show 1/2x∗6−2/3y∗6=7/3∗61/2 x * 6 - 2/3 y * 6 = 7/3 * 6, then 6/2x−12/3y=42/36/2 x - 12/3 y = 42/3, and finally 3x−4y=143x - 4y = 14.

Proof
Steps
  1. Expression
    12x−23y=73\frac{1}{2}x - \frac{2}{3}y = \frac{7}{3}
    Explanation

    Start with the original first equation.

    Justification

    Given in the video.

    Shown in the video
  2. Expression
    12x⋅6−23y⋅6=73⋅6\frac{1}{2}x \cdot 6 - \frac{2}{3}y \cdot 6 = \frac{7}{3} \cdot 6
    Explanation

    Multiply every term in the equation by the common denominator 6.

    Justification

    Multiplication property of equality.

    Shown in the video
  3. Expression
    62x−123y=423\frac{6}{2}x - \frac{12}{3}y = \frac{42}{3}
    Explanation

    Perform the multiplication in the numerators.

    Justification

    Arithmetic multiplication.

    Shown in the video
  4. Expression
    3x−4y=143x - 4y = 14
    Explanation

    Reduce each fraction by dividing the numerator by the denominator.

    Justification

    Simplifying fractions.

    Shown in the video
Conclusion

The first equation simplifies to 3x−4y=143x - 4y = 14.

Derivation of the simplified second equation

Clear evidence
Shown in the video
Evidence
  1. Audio
    Observation

    The speaker identifies the common denominator for equation b) as 20 and multiplies through.

  2. Formula
    Observation

    The written steps show 3/4x∗20+1/5y∗20=11/10∗203/4 x * 20 + 1/5 y * 20 = 11/10 * 20, then 60/4x+20/5y=220/1060/4 x + 20/5 y = 220/10, and finally 15x+4y=2215x + 4y = 22.

Proof
Steps
  1. Expression
    34x+15y=1110\frac{3}{4}x + \frac{1}{5}y = \frac{11}{10}
    Explanation

    Start with the original second equation.

    Justification

    Given in the video.

    Shown in the video
  2. Expression
    34x⋅20+15y⋅20=1110⋅20\frac{3}{4}x \cdot 20 + \frac{1}{5}y \cdot 20 = \frac{11}{10} \cdot 20
    Explanation

    Multiply every term in the equation by the common denominator 20.

    Justification

    Multiplication property of equality.

    Shown in the video
  3. Expression
    604x+205y=22010\frac{60}{4}x + \frac{20}{5}y = \frac{220}{10}
    Explanation

    Perform the multiplication in the numerators.

    Justification

    Arithmetic multiplication.

    Shown in the video
  4. Expression
    15x+4y=2215x + 4y = 22
    Explanation

    Reduce each fraction by dividing the numerator by the denominator.

    Justification

    Simplifying fractions.

    Shown in the video
Conclusion

The second equation simplifies to 15x+4y=2215x + 4y = 22.

Derivation of x by elimination

Clear evidence
Shown in the video
Evidence
  1. Formula
    Observation

    The instructor adds the two displayed equations and writes 18x=3618x = 36, then x=2x = 2.

  2. Audio
    Observation

    He says, 'We just add the equations. So I have 18x ... equals 36, so x is equal to 2.'

Proof
Steps
  1. Expression
    3x−4y=143x - 4y = 14
    Explanation

    Start with the first reduced equation.

    Justification

    Given equation on the page.

    Shown in the video
  2. Expression
    15x+4y=2215x + 4y = 22
    Explanation

    Start with the second reduced equation.

    Justification

    Given equation on the page.

    Shown in the video
  3. Expression
    (3x+15x)+(−4y+4y)=14+22(3x+15x)+(-4y+4y)=14+22
    Explanation

    Add the equations term by term.

    Justification

    Elimination by addition when y-coefficients are opposites.

    Derived from the video
  4. Expression
    18x=3618x = 36
    Explanation

    The y-terms cancel and the x-terms combine.

    Justification

    Arithmetic simplification.

    Shown in the video
  5. Expression
    x=2x = 2
    Explanation

    Divide both sides by 18.

    Justification

    Solving a one-variable linear equation.

    Shown in the video
Conclusion

The elimination step gives x=2x=2.

Derivation of y by back-substitution and clearing denominators

Clear evidence
Shown in the video
Evidence
  1. Formula
    Observation

    The instructor substitutes x=2x=2 into 1/2x−2/3y=7/31/2 x - 2/3 y = 7/3, obtains 1−2/3y=7/31 - 2/3 y = 7/3, multiplies by 3 to get 3−2y=73 - 2y = 7, then writes -2y = 4 and y=−2y = -2.

  2. Audio
    Observation

    He narrates each algebraic step, including multiplying everything by 3 and dividing by -2.

Proof
Steps
  1. Expression
    12(2)−23y=73\frac{1}{2}(2)-\frac{2}{3}y=\frac{7}{3}
    Explanation

    Substitute x=2x=2 into the first original equation.

    Justification

    Back-substitution of the known value.

    Shown in the video
  2. Expression
    1−23y=731-\frac{2}{3}y=\frac{7}{3}
    Explanation

    Compute (1/21/2)(2)=1.

    Justification

    Fraction multiplication and simplification.

    Shown in the video
  3. Expression
    3−2y=73-2y=7
    Explanation

    Multiply every term by 3 to clear denominators.

    Justification

    Equivalent transformation using a common denominator.

    Shown in the video
  4. Expression
    −2y=4-2y=4
    Explanation

    Subtract 3 from both sides.

    Justification

    Isolating the y-term.

    Shown in the video
  5. Expression
    y=−2y=-2
    Explanation

    Divide both sides by -2.

    Justification

    Solving a one-variable linear equation.

    Shown in the video
Conclusion

The remaining unknown is y=−2y=-2, so the ordered pair is (2,-2).

Verification of the solution pair by direct substitution

Clear evidence
Shown in the video
Evidence
  1. Formula
    Observation

    The full visible chain is 34(2)+15(−2)=1110\frac{3}{4}(2)+\frac{1}{5}(-2)=\frac{11}{10}, then 64−25=1110\frac{6}{4}-\frac{2}{5}=\frac{11}{10}, then 3020−820=1110\frac{30}{20}-\frac{8}{20}=\frac{11}{10}, then 2220=1110\frac{22}{20}=\frac{11}{10}.

  2. Audio
    Observation

    The narration follows the same order: substitute, multiply, find common denominator, subtract, reduce, conclude correctness.

Proof
Steps
  1. Expression
    34(2)+15(−2)\frac{3}{4}(2)+\frac{1}{5}(-2)
    Explanation

    Start from the second equation and replace xx by 2 and yy by −2-2.

    Justification

    Substitution of the candidate solution into the equation being checked.

    Shown in the video
  2. Expression
    64−25\frac{6}{4}-\frac{2}{5}
    Explanation

    Evaluate each product separately.

    Justification

    Multiplying a fraction by an integer multiplies the numerator; the sign of −2-2 carries into the second term.

    Shown in the video
  3. Expression
    3020−820\frac{30}{20}-\frac{8}{20}
    Explanation

    Rewrite both fractions with denominator 20.

    Justification

    Use equivalent fractions obtained by multiplying by 55\frac{5}{5} and 44\frac{4}{4}, which do not change value.

    Shown in the video
  4. Expression
    2220\frac{22}{20}
    Explanation

    Subtract the numerators while keeping the common denominator.

    Justification

    Rule for subtracting fractions with the same denominator.

    Shown in the video
  5. Expression
    1110\frac{11}{10}
    Explanation

    Reduce the result to lowest terms.

    Justification

    Divide numerator and denominator by their common factor 2.

    Shown in the video
  6. Expression
    1110=1110\frac{11}{10}=\frac{11}{10}
    Explanation

    Compare the simplified left-hand side with the right-hand side of the original equation.

    Justification

    A true numerical equality confirms the candidate pair satisfies the equation.

    Shown in the video
Conclusion

The ordered pair (2,−2)(2,-2) checks in the displayed equation, so the verification succeeds.

Worked examples · 4

Fraction example with two linear equations

Clear evidence
Shown in the video
Evidence
  1. Audio
    Observation

    Speaker says, "So in the first tutorial I'm going to go through a fraction example."

  2. Formula
    Observation

    The page shows "Fraction Example" followed by two labeled equations.

  3. Formula
    Observation

    Equation a) is "1/2x−2/3y=7/31/2 x - 2/3 y = 7/3" and equation b) is "3/4x+1/5y=11/103/4 x + 1/5 y = 11/10".

Uncertainties
  1. The clip does not solve either equation.

  2. It is not shown whether these are meant as a system or as separate practice equations, although the speaker says they are treated independently for denominator elimination.

Problem

Solve linear equations with rational coefficients, beginning by eliminating denominators.

Given
  1. Equation a): 12x−23y=73\frac{1}{2}x-\frac{2}{3}y=\frac{7}{3}

  2. Equation b): 34x+15y=1110\frac{3}{4}x+\frac{1}{5}y=\frac{11}{10}

Goal

Set up the first step for removing fractional denominators from each equation.

Steps
  1. Expression
    Write the two equations as a) and b).\text{Write the two equations as a) and b).}
    Explanation

    The presenter labels the equations before discussing the method.

    Justification

    Observed directly from the handwriting and audio naming.

    Shown in the video
  2. Expression
    For equation a), identify the denominators.\text{For equation a), identify the denominators.}
    Explanation

    The speaker focuses first on equation a) and notes the denominators 2 and 3.

    Justification

    Audio explicitly discusses equation a) and the denominators between 2 and 3.

    Shown in the video
  3. Expression
    Find Common Denominator\text{Find Common Denominator}
    Explanation

    The written plan states that the next task is to find a common denominator.

    Justification

    Written on the page beneath the equations.

    Shown in the video
  4. Expression
    × Multiply through\times \text{ Multiply through}
    Explanation

    The written plan states that after finding the common denominator, one should multiply through.

    Justification

    Written on the page and echoed in the audio.

    Shown in the video
Answer

No final solution is given in this clip; only the setup step is completed.

Verification

The clip ends before any cleared-denominator equation or solution is produced, so verification is not available within this segment.

Solving a linear system with rational coefficients

Clear evidence
Shown in the video
Evidence
  1. Formula
    Observation

    The full system and all transformation steps are written on the paper.

  2. Audio
    Observation

    The speaker narrates the process of finding common denominators, multiplying through, and reducing the equations.

Problem

Solve the system of linear equations: a) 1/2x−2/3y=7/31/2 x - 2/3 y = 7/3, b) 3/4x+1/5y=11/103/4 x + 1/5 y = 11/10.

Given
  1. Equation a): 12x−23y=73\frac{1}{2}x - \frac{2}{3}y = \frac{7}{3}

  2. Equation b): 34x+15y=1110\frac{3}{4}x + \frac{1}{5}y = \frac{11}{10}

Goal

Transform the system into one with integer coefficients to prepare for solving.

Steps
  1. Expression
    Common denominator for a) is 6\text{Common denominator for a) is } 6
    Explanation

    Identify the least common multiple of the denominators 2, 3, and 3.

    Justification

    Finding a common denominator to clear fractions.

    Shown in the video
  2. Expression
    12x⋅6−23y⋅6=73⋅6⇒3x−4y=14\frac{1}{2}x \cdot 6 - \frac{2}{3}y \cdot 6 = \frac{7}{3} \cdot 6 \Rightarrow 3x - 4y = 14
    Explanation

    Multiply equation a) by 6 and simplify.

    Justification

    Multiplication property of equality and fraction reduction.

    Shown in the video
  3. Expression
    Common denominator for b) is 20\text{Common denominator for b) is } 20
    Explanation

    Identify the least common multiple of the denominators 4, 5, and 10.

    Justification

    Finding a common denominator to clear fractions.

    Shown in the video
  4. Expression
    34x⋅20+15y⋅20=1110⋅20⇒15x+4y=22\frac{3}{4}x \cdot 20 + \frac{1}{5}y \cdot 20 = \frac{11}{10} \cdot 20 \Rightarrow 15x + 4y = 22
    Explanation

    Multiply equation b) by 20 and simplify.

    Justification

    Multiplication property of equality and fraction reduction.

    Shown in the video
Answer

The transformed system is 3x−4y=143x - 4y = 14 and 15x+4y=2215x + 4y = 22.

Verification

The speaker notes that this new system can now be solved using substitution or elimination.

Worked example: solving a rational-coefficient linear system

Clear evidence
Shown in the video
Evidence
  1. Formula
    Observation

    The page presents the original fractional system 1/2x−2/3y=7/31/2 x - 2/3 y = 7/3 and 3/4x+1/5y=11/103/4 x + 1/5 y = 11/10, then the reduced system 3x−4y=143x - 4y = 14 and 15x+4y=2215x + 4y = 22.

  2. Audio
    Observation

    The instructor solves the system by elimination, substitutes x=2x=2 into the first original equation, finds y=−2y=-2, and begins a check in the second equation.

Uncertainties
  1. The final verification line is not completed within the clip.

Problem

Solve the system given by the original equations 1/2x−2/3y=7/31/2 x - 2/3 y = 7/3 and 3/4x+1/5y=11/103/4 x + 1/5 y = 11/10, using the reduced integer system shown on the page.

Given
  1. Original equation a): 12x−23y=73\frac{1}{2}x-\frac{2}{3}y=\frac{7}{3}.

  2. Original equation b): 34x+15y=1110\frac{3}{4}x+\frac{1}{5}y=\frac{11}{10}.

  3. Reduced system shown: 3x−4y=143x-4y=14 and 15x+4y=2215x+4y=22.

Goal

Find the ordered pair (x,y) satisfying the system and begin verifying it.

Steps
  1. Expression
    3x−4y=14,15x+4y=223x - 4y = 14,\quad 15x + 4y = 22
    Explanation

    Use the reduced integer system because the y-coefficients are opposites.

    Justification

    Preparation for elimination.

    Shown in the video
  2. Expression
    18x=3618x = 36
    Explanation

    Add the two equations to eliminate y.

    Justification

    Opposite coefficients cancel under addition.

    Shown in the video
  3. Expression
    x=2x = 2
    Explanation

    Solve for x.

    Justification

    Divide by 18.

    Shown in the video
  4. Expression
    12(2)−23y=73\frac{1}{2}(2)-\frac{2}{3}y=\frac{7}{3}
    Explanation

    Substitute x=2x=2 into the first original equation.

    Justification

    Back-substitution to find y.

    Shown in the video
  5. Expression
    1−23y=731-\frac{2}{3}y=\frac{7}{3}
    Explanation

    Simplify the substituted term.

    Justification

    (1/21/2)(2)=1.

    Shown in the video
  6. Expression
    3−2y=73-2y=7
    Explanation

    Multiply through by 3 to remove fractions.

    Justification

    Common denominator clearing.

    Shown in the video
  7. Expression
    −2y=4-2y=4
    Explanation

    Subtract 3 from both sides.

    Justification

    Isolate the y-term.

    Shown in the video
  8. Expression
    y=−2y=-2
    Explanation

    Divide by -2.

    Justification

    Solve for y.

    Shown in the video
  9. Expression
    34(2)+15(−2)\frac{3}{4}(2)+\frac{1}{5}(-2)
    Explanation

    Begin checking the solution in the second original equation.

    Justification

    Verification step stated by the instructor.

    Shown in the video
Answer

Solution (2,-2)

Verification

The instructor starts the check by substituting (2,-2) into the second original equation, but the clip ends before the arithmetic is finished.

Checking (2,−2)(2,-2) in 34x+15y=1110\frac{3}{4}x+\frac{1}{5}y=\frac{11}{10}

Clear evidence
Shown in the video
Evidence
  1. Formula
    Observation

    The page heading includes Fraction Example, and the worked line is 34(2)+15(−2)=1110\frac{3}{4}(2)+\frac{1}{5}(-2)=\frac{11}{10}.

  2. Audio
    Observation

    The instructor narrates the whole check and ends by saying we are correct there.

Problem

Verify that the previously found solution x=2x=2, y=−2y=-2 satisfies the second equation of the displayed system.

Given
  1. Equation to check: 34x+15y=1110\frac{3}{4}x+\frac{1}{5}y=\frac{11}{10}.

  2. Candidate values: x=2x=2, y=−2y=-2.

Goal

Show whether substituting the candidate values makes the equation true.

Steps
  1. Expression
    34(2)+15(−2)\frac{3}{4}(2)+\frac{1}{5}(-2)
    Explanation

    Substitute the known values into the left-hand side.

    Justification

    Direct substitution for verification.

    Shown in the video
  2. Expression
    64−25\frac{6}{4}-\frac{2}{5}
    Explanation

    Compute the two products.

    Justification

    Fraction-times-integer multiplication.

    Shown in the video
  3. Expression
    3020−820\frac{30}{20}-\frac{8}{20}
    Explanation

    Convert to a common denominator of 20.

    Justification

    Equivalent fractions created by multiplying by 55\frac{5}{5} and 44\frac{4}{4}.

    Shown in the video
  4. Expression
    2220\frac{22}{20}
    Explanation

    Subtract the numerators.

    Justification

    Same-denominator fraction subtraction.

    Shown in the video
  5. Expression
    1110\frac{11}{10}
    Explanation

    Reduce the fraction.

    Justification

    Cancel the common factor 2.

    Shown in the video
Answer

Yes; the left-hand side simplifies to 1110\frac{11}{10}, matching the right-hand side, so (2,−2)(2,-2) is verified.

Verification

The final comparison is the true statement 1110=1110\frac{11}{10}=\frac{11}{10}.

Visual events · 10

Writing the section title

Clear evidence
Shown in the video
Evidence
  1. Animation
    Observation

    A hand writes the heading across the top of graph paper.

  2. Formula
    Observation

    The visible text becomes "Section 1.6 Solving linear equation with Rational #s".

Uncertainties
  1. The exact spacing and capitalization vary in the handwriting, but the wording is legible.

Objects
  1. graph paper

  2. hand

  3. pen

  4. heading text

Changes
  1. Blank page becomes titled with the section name.

Invariants
  1. The camera remains fixed overhead.

  2. No equations are present yet.

Interpretation

The visual establishes the lesson topic before any example is introduced.

Writing the fraction example equations

Clear evidence
Shown in the video
Evidence
  1. Animation
    Observation

    The hand writes "Fraction Example" and then adds two labeled equations underneath.

  2. Formula
    Observation

    The equations become visible as a) 12x−23y=73\frac{1}{2}x-\frac{2}{3}y=\frac{7}{3} and b) 34x+15y=1110\frac{3}{4}x+\frac{1}{5}y=\frac{11}{10}.

Objects
  1. heading "Fraction Example"

  2. equation a)

  3. equation b)

  4. pen

  5. paper

Changes
  1. A new subheading is added.

  2. Two equations are written one after the other.

  3. The page changes from title-only to a worked example setup.

Invariants
  1. The equations remain in fractional form throughout this interval.

Interpretation

The visual introduces the concrete example that the rest of the clip analyzes.

Writing the denominator-elimination plan

Clear evidence
Shown in the video
Evidence
  1. Animation
    Observation

    The hand writes a short method note below the equations.

  2. Formula
    Observation

    The visible note reads "Find Common Denominator" and then "x Multiply through".

Uncertainties
  1. The symbol before "Multiply through" is a multiplication sign written as "x".

Objects
  1. method note

  2. multiplication sign

  3. paper

Changes
  1. A procedural reminder is added beneath the example.

Invariants
  1. No algebraic transformation of the equations is shown yet.

Interpretation

The visual records the intended next step: clear fractions by multiplying through by a common denominator.

Writing the solution steps on graph paper

Clear evidence
Shown in the video
Evidence
  1. Animation
    Observation

    A hand writes mathematical equations and steps on graph paper throughout the video.

Objects
  1. Hand

  2. Pen

  3. Graph paper

  4. Mathematical equations

Changes
  1. The hand writes the initial system of equations.

  2. The hand writes the multiplication steps for equation a).

  3. The hand writes the simplified equation a).

  4. The hand writes the multiplication steps for equation b).

  5. The hand writes the simplified equation b).

Invariants
  1. The camera angle remains fixed on the graph paper.

  2. The lighting remains consistent.

Interpretation

The visual progression shows the step-by-step algebraic manipulation required to clear fractions from a linear system.

Static worksheet layout before new writing

Clear evidence
Shown in the video
Evidence
  1. Diagram
    Observation

    A handwritten sheet titled 'Section 1.6 Solving linear equation with Rational #' shows two original fractional equations at the top, their cleared-denominator forms, and below them the reduced system 3x−4y=143x - 4y = 14 and 15x+4y=2215x + 4y = 22.

Objects
  1. Title line

  2. Original equations a) and b)

  3. Intermediate cleared-denominator equations

  4. Reduced system 3x−4y=143x - 4y = 14 and 15x+4y=2215x + 4y = 22

Changes
  1. No new mathematics is introduced at the very start; the page already contains the setup for the worked example.

Invariants
  1. The original fractional equations remain visible throughout.

  2. The reduced integer system remains visible throughout.

Interpretation

The visual organization separates the problem statement from the solution work, making the elimination setup explicit before any new steps are written.

Animated elimination step on the page

Clear evidence
Shown in the video
Evidence
  1. Animation
    Observation

    The pen writes 'Solve using elimination', then 'add the equation', draws a line under the system, and writes 18x=3618x = 36 followed by x=2x = 2.

Objects
  1. System of two equations

  2. Written instruction 'Solve using elimination'

  3. Sum line

  4. Result 18x=3618x = 36

  5. Result x=2x = 2

Changes
  1. The y-terms disappear visually after addition.

  2. A new one-variable equation appears below the system.

  3. x is isolated in the next line.

Invariants
  1. The original two equations stay above the new work.

  2. The operation being demonstrated is addition of equations.

Interpretation

The writing sequence shows the causal structure of elimination: align equations, add them, cancel opposite terms, then solve the remaining equation.

Animated back-substitution and fraction clearing

Clear evidence
Shown in the video
Evidence
  1. Animation
    Observation

    The pen writes 'Solve for y given x=2x=2', then substitutes into 1/2(2)−2/3y=7/31/2(2) - 2/3 y = 7/3, simplifies to 1−2/3y=7/31 - 2/3 y = 7/3, multiplies by 3 to get 3−2y=73 - 2y = 7, then writes -2y = 4 and y=−2y = -2.

Objects
  1. Instruction 'Solve for y given x=2x=2'

  2. Substituted equation

  3. Simplified equation

  4. Cleared-denominator equation

  5. Final y-value

Changes
  1. x is replaced by 2.

  2. Fractions are removed by multiplying by 3.

  3. The equation is transformed stepwise until y is isolated.

Invariants
  1. The chosen equation is the first original equation.

  2. Each new line is an equivalent transformation of the previous one.

Interpretation

The visual progression demonstrates how a known variable value is inserted into an original fractional equation and then reduced to a simple linear equation in one unknown.

Solution statement and beginning of verification

Clear evidence
Shown in the video
Evidence
  1. Animation
    Observation

    The pen writes 'Solution (2, -2)' and then begins the check by writing 3/4(2)+1/5(−2)3/4(2) + 1/5(-2) ... on the lower left.

Uncertainties
  1. The check expression is incomplete by the end of the clip.

Objects
  1. Ordered pair (2,-2)

  2. Check expression using the second original equation

Changes
  1. The solved values are packaged as an ordered pair.

  2. A new verification line is started in the unused equation.

Invariants
  1. The solution pair remains (2,-2).

  2. The verification uses the second original equation.

Interpretation

The page transitions from solving to validating, indicating that finding a candidate pair is not the final mathematical step until substitution confirms it.

Static handwritten worksheet view

Clear evidence
Shown in the video
Evidence
  1. Diagram
    Observation

    A single sheet of graph paper fills the frame, with the title Section 1.6 Solving Linear Equation with Rational #'s and Fraction Example at the top, a solved system in the middle, and the verification work added at the bottom left.

Objects
  1. Graph-paper worksheet

  2. Handwritten title Section 1.6 Solving Linear Equation with Rational #'s

  3. Handwritten subtitle Fraction Example

  4. Previously written system-solving work

  5. Bottom-left verification arithmetic

Changes
  1. New lines are added sequentially under the existing work as the instructor writes the check.

  2. Near the end the sheet is slid upward so more of the lower writing remains in view.

Invariants
  1. The camera remains fixed overhead.

  2. The earlier solved work above stays visible while the new verification is written below it.

Interpretation

The visual layout separates prior solution work from the current verification step, making the clip function as a check of an already obtained answer rather than a fresh solve.

Step-by-step writing of the verification arithmetic

Clear evidence
Shown in the video
Evidence
  1. Animation
    Observation

    The hand writes 64\frac{6}{4}, then −25-\frac{2}{5}, then the converted fractions 3020\frac{30}{20} and 820\frac{8}{20}, then 2220\frac{22}{20}, and finally 1110\frac{11}{10}.

Objects
  1. Pen tip

  2. Successive handwritten fractions

  3. Equality signs linking the steps

Changes
  1. Each new line depends on the previous one: products first, then common-denominator rewrite, then subtraction, then reduction.

Invariants
  1. The target right-hand side 1110\frac{11}{10} is present from the start of the check.

  2. The substituted values 22 and −2-2 do not change during the computation.

Interpretation

The writing order visually encodes the algebraic procedure: substitute, simplify products, rename fractions equivalently, subtract, reduce, compare.

Misconceptions · 6

Mentioned coefficient types are not all demonstrated here

Clear evidence
Shown in the video
Evidence
  1. Audio
    Observation

    Speaker mentions "maybe even roots and stuff like that" while listing possible coefficient forms.

  2. Formula
    Observation

    Only fractional-coefficient equations are actually written in this clip.

Misconception

One might infer from the spoken list that roots, decimals, and bracketed forms are all being solved in this segment.

Clarification

In this clip, only a fraction example is written and discussed; roots and decimals are mentioned verbally as other possible cases but are not demonstrated.

Sign errors when multiplying through

Clear evidence
Shown in the video
Evidence
  1. Audio
    Observation

    The speaker says, 'Oops, this is a plus sign here, right? Plus sign, plus sign, make sure we don't make those mistakes.'

  2. Formula
    Observation

    The speaker corrects a written minus sign to a plus sign in the intermediate step for equation b).

Misconception

When multiplying terms by a common denominator, it is easy to accidentally change a plus sign to a minus sign or vice versa.

Clarification

Carefully check the sign of each term before and after multiplying through to ensure the equation remains equivalent.

Assuming elimination always works immediately

Clear evidence
Shown in the video
Evidence
  1. Audio
    Observation

    The instructor says it won't always be set up like that and sometimes you'll have to do some manipulation before.

Misconception

Learners may think any linear system can be solved by simply adding the equations as written.

Clarification

Direct addition works here only because the y-coefficients are already opposites; otherwise the equations must first be manipulated.

Treating the found pair as automatically correct

Clear evidence
Shown in the video
Evidence
  1. Audio
    Observation

    The instructor calls the check the last step to reassure ourselves that the answer is correct.

Misconception

Students may stop after obtaining (2,-2) and assume no further validation is needed.

Clarification

The video explicitly models a final check by substituting the pair into the other original equation.

Mistaking equivalent-fraction rewriting for a value change

Clear evidence
Shown in the video
Evidence
  1. Audio
    Observation

    The instructor explicitly warns that multiplying by 55\frac{5}{5} or 44\frac{4}{4} is multiplying by one, so you are not changing the value.

Misconception

Students may think that changing 64\frac{6}{4} to 3020\frac{30}{20} or 25\frac{2}{5} to 820\frac{8}{20} alters the number.

Clarification

The video stresses that these are equivalent fractions produced by multiplying by forms of 1, so the values remain the same while the denominators become compatible for subtraction.

Trying to subtract unlike fractions directly

Clear evidence
Shown in the video
Evidence
  1. Audio
    Observation

    He says we have to do a common denominator here to subtract these two.

Misconception

Learners may attempt to subtract 64\frac{6}{4} and 25\frac{2}{5} without first rewriting them.

Clarification

The clip shows that the subtraction is postponed until both fractions share denominator 20, after which only the numerators are subtracted.

Concept relations · 14

Topic: solving linear equations with rational coefficients → Fraction example with two linear equations

Clear evidence
Shown in the video
Evidence
  1. Audio
    Observation

    The speaker first states the general topic and then says, "So in the first tutorial I'm going to go through a fraction example."

  2. Formula
    Observation

    The written title is followed by the written "Fraction Example" and two equations.

Application
Explanation

The general topic of solving linear equations with rational coefficients is instantiated by the displayed fraction example.

Fraction example with two linear equations → Method: eliminate denominators by finding a common denominator and multiplying through

Clear evidence
Shown in the video
Evidence
  1. Audio
    Observation

    After showing the equations, the speaker explains the first goal is to eliminate denominators.

  2. Formula
    Observation

    The written note "Find Common Denominator" and "x Multiply through" appears directly under the example.

Application
Explanation

The example motivates the specific method of clearing fractional coefficients by finding a common denominator and multiplying through.

Rational-number forms mentioned for coefficients → Fraction example with two linear equations

Clear evidence
Shown in the video
Evidence
  1. Audio
    Observation

    The speaker lists fractions among the possible rational-number forms.

  2. Formula
    Observation

    The written example uses fractional coefficients.

Special case
Explanation

The displayed example is the fraction case within the broader set of rational-coefficient forms mentioned by the speaker.

Method for clearing fractions in a linear system → Derivation of the simplified first equation

Clear evidence
Shown in the video
Evidence
  1. Audio
    Observation

    The speaker explains the general method and then applies it to the specific equations.

Application
Explanation

The general method for clearing fractions is applied to derive the simplified first equation.

Method for clearing fractions in a linear system → Derivation of the simplified second equation

Clear evidence
Shown in the video
Evidence
  1. Audio
    Observation

    The speaker explains the general method and then applies it to the specific equations.

Application
Explanation

The general method for clearing fractions is applied to derive the simplified second equation.

Derivation of the simplified first equation → Reducing equations after clearing fractions

Clear evidence
Shown in the video
Evidence
  1. Audio
    Observation

    The speaker states, 'Then we reduce the equation.'

Proof dependency
Explanation

The derivation of the simplified equations depends on the method of reducing fractions after multiplying through.

Elimination method for a prepared linear system → Back-substitution into an original equation

Clear evidence
Shown in the video
Evidence
  1. Audio
    Observation

    After obtaining x=2x=2 by elimination, the instructor says then we would solve for y given that we know x=2x=2.

  2. Formula
    Observation

    The next written step substitutes x=2x=2 into the first original equation.

Application
Explanation

Elimination produces one variable value, and that result is then applied through back-substitution to determine the other variable.

Back-substitution into an original equation → Clearing denominators in a one-variable equation

Clear evidence
Shown in the video
Evidence
  1. Formula
    Observation

    After substitution gives 1−2/3y=7/31 - 2/3 y = 7/3, the instructor multiplies by 3 to obtain 3−2y=73 - 2y = 7.

  2. Audio
    Observation

    He explains eliminating the denominator by using the common denominator 3.

Application
Explanation

Back-substitution creates a fractional one-variable equation, and clearing denominators is the method used to simplify it.

Back-substitution into an original equation → Checking a system solution in the unused equation

Clear evidence
Shown in the video
Evidence
  1. Audio
    Observation

    The instructor says the last step is to reassure ourselves by a check and will use the other equation.

  2. Formula
    Observation

    He begins substituting (2,-2) into the second original equation.

Application
Explanation

Once the ordered pair is found by substitution, the next procedural step is verification in the remaining original equation.

Elimination method for a prepared linear system → Clearing denominators in a one-variable equation

Clear evidence
Shown in the video
Evidence
  1. Formula
    Observation

    The page shows the original fractional equations above and the reduced integer system below, with arrows indicating transformation.

Uncertainties
  1. The clip does not re-derive the reduction; it is already written on the page at the start.

Prerequisite
Explanation

The elimination method is applied after the original rational system has already been converted to an integer system by clearing denominators.

Substituting a found solution back into an equation → Multiplying a fraction by an integer

Clear evidence
Shown in the video
Evidence
  1. Formula
    Observation

    The verification begins with substituted values and only then proceeds to fraction multiplication.

Prerequisite
Explanation

The arithmetic simplification can begin only after the candidate values have been inserted into the equation.

Using a common denominator to subtract fractions → Subtracting fractions with the same denominator

Clear evidence
Shown in the video
Evidence
  1. Audio
    Observation

    The speaker says a common denominator is needed to subtract these two, then performs the subtraction after rewriting.

Prerequisite
Explanation

Same-denominator subtraction is applied only after the fractions have been converted to denominator 20.

Find an answer · 15

What topic does Section 1.6 cover in this clip?

Clear evidence
Shown in the video
Evidence
  1. Audio
    Observation

    Opening narration states the subject of the tutorial.

  2. Formula
    Observation

    Title text is visible on the page.

Knowledge points
  1. Topic: solving linear equations with rational coefficients

How do you start solving a linear equation with fractional coefficients?

Clear evidence
Shown in the video
Evidence
  1. Audio
    Observation

    Speaker explains the first goal is to eliminate denominators.

  2. Formula
    Observation

    Written note says "Find Common Denominator" and "x Multiply through".

Knowledge points
  1. Method: eliminate denominators by finding a common denominator and multiplying through

What are the two example equations shown in the fraction example?

Clear evidence
Shown in the video
Evidence
  1. Formula
    Observation

    Both equations are written clearly on the page.

Knowledge points
  1. Fraction example with two linear equations

Are the two equations handled together or separately when clearing denominators?

Clear evidence
Shown in the video
Evidence
  1. Audio
    Observation

    Speaker says each equation is treated independently.

Knowledge points
  1. Each equation is treated independently when eliminating denominators

How do you clear fractions from a linear equation with rational coefficients?

Clear evidence
Shown in the video
Evidence
  1. Audio
    Observation

    The speaker explains the process of finding a common denominator and multiplying through.

Knowledge points
  1. Method for clearing fractions in a linear system
  2. Derivation of the simplified first equation
  3. Derivation of the simplified second equation

How do you determine the correct common denominator to use for an equation with multiple fractions?

Clear evidence
Shown in the video
Evidence
  1. Audio
    Observation

    The speaker explicitly finds the common denominators 6 and 20 for the two equations.

Knowledge points
  1. Method for clearing fractions in a linear system

What is a common mistake to watch out for when multiplying through an equation to clear fractions?

Clear evidence
Shown in the video
Evidence
  1. Audio
    Observation

    The speaker corrects a sign error and warns about making such mistakes.

Knowledge points
  1. Sign errors when multiplying through

Why can the two equations be added directly to eliminate y in this example?

Clear evidence
Shown in the video
Evidence
  1. Audio
    Observation

    The instructor explains that because there is a negative 4y and a positive 4y, one can just add the equations.

Knowledge points
  1. Elimination method for a prepared linear system

After finding x=2x=2, why does the instructor substitute into an original equation instead of the reduced system?

Clear evidence
Shown in the video
Evidence
  1. Audio
    Observation

    The instructor says they could choose one of those original equations and then substitutes into the first one.

Knowledge points
  1. Back-substitution into an original equation

Why multiply the equation 1−2/3y=7/31 - 2/3 y = 7/3 by 3?

Clear evidence
Shown in the video
Evidence
  1. Audio
    Observation

    The instructor says the common denominator would be 3 and to multiply everything by 3.

Knowledge points
  1. Clearing denominators in a one-variable equation

Why check the solution in the other original equation rather than the one already used?

Clear evidence
Shown in the video
Evidence
  1. Audio
    Observation

    The instructor says the last step is to reassure ourselves by a check and will use the other equation.

Knowledge points
  1. Checking a system solution in the unused equation

How do you verify that an ordered pair solves a linear equation with fractions?

Clear evidence
Shown in the video
Evidence
  1. Audio
    Observation

    The instructor says we know that we are correct there after the arithmetic matches.

  2. Formula
    Observation

    The page shows substitution into 34x+15y=1110\frac{3}{4}x+\frac{1}{5}y=\frac{11}{10}.

Knowledge points
  1. Substituting a found solution back into an equation
  2. Verifying a solution by producing a true statement
Coverage and review notes

Covered · Brief opening pause before speech begins; no mathematical content beyond the start of the tutorial setup.

Covered · Spoken introduction and handwritten section title establish the topic of solving linear equations with rational coefficients.

Covered · Speaker lists possible rational-coefficient forms such as fractions, decimals, brackets, binomial tops, and roots.

Covered · The presenter writes "Fraction Example" and the two equations a) and b).

Covered · Speaker explains the first goal is to eliminate denominators, treats each equation independently, and writes the plan to find a common denominator and multiply through.

Covered · The entire clip covers the method and application of clearing fractions from a linear system.

Covered · The page already displays the original fractional system, the cleared-denominator forms, and the reduced integer system; the instructor introduces elimination as the preferred method.

Covered · The instructor explains that the opposite y-coefficients allow direct addition, writes the elimination steps, and derives x=2x=2.

Covered · Using x=2x=2, the instructor substitutes into the first original equation, clears denominators by multiplying by 3, and solves to get y=−2y=-2.

Covered · The solution (2,-2) is written, and the instructor begins a verification in the second original equation; the clip ends before the check is completed.

Covered · The clip opens with the substituted verification line and the statement that y=−2y=-2 will give 1110\frac{11}{10}.

Covered · The instructor computes 64\frac{6}{4} and −25-\frac{2}{5} from the substituted products.

Covered · He explains the need for a common denominator and rewrites the fractions using 55\frac{5}{5} and 44\frac{4}{4}.

Covered · The subtraction, reduction to 1110\frac{11}{10}, and conclusion that the solution is correct are shown.

Covered · No new mathematics is introduced; the presenter slides the page up and announces that the next tutorial will use fractions with binomial tops.

Explore the knowledge in this video

Reviewed subject paths